Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26330769›Full record

ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2015

Comparison of acellular nerve allograft modification with Schwann cells or VEGF.

Gwendolyn Hoben, Ying Yan, Nisha Iyer, Piyaraj Newton, Dan A Hunter, Amy M Moore, Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert, Matthew D Wood, Susan E Mackinnon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Schwann cells in regeneration and cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Restoration of Neurological Function Following Peripheral Nerve Trauma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gwendolyn HobenDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
Ying YanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
Nisha IyerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, Campus Box 1097, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Piyaraj NewtonDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
Dan A HunterDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
Amy M MooreDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
Shelly E Sakiyama-ElbertDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, Campus Box 1097, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Matthew D WoodDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
Susan E MackinnonDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

THE EFFECTS OF GDNF ON PERIPHERAL NERVE REGENERATIONR01NS051706 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MACKINNON, SUSAN E, SAKIYAMA-ELBERT, SHELLY ELESE · 2006 to 2016
$4.0M
NERVE ALLOTRANSPLANTATION FOR TRAUMATIC NERVE INJURYR56NS033406 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MACKINNON, SUSAN E, STEWART, SHEILA A · 2012 to 2012
$532k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051706NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS033406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividual contributions of exogenous Schwann cells (SCs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were evaluated in acellular nerve allografts (ANAs). ANA processing removes SCs and vasculature, likely contributing to reduced regeneration compared to autografts. Exogenous SCs may improve the regenerative microenvironment, and VEGF has been shown to stimulate angiogenesis. Replacing these components in ANAs may improve regeneration.

methodsA rat sciatic nerve transection model was used to study 20-mm grafts. Four graft types were studied: (1) isograft, (2) ANA, (3) ANA-SCs, and (4) ANA-VEGF. After 10 weeks in vivo, the midgraft and distal nerve to the grafts were analyzed for axonal regeneration using histomorphometry to assess total myelinated axon counts, density, width, and percent neural tissue.

resultsThe most axons in the distal nerve were regenerated in the isograft followed by the ANA- SC group, with 9171 ± 1822 and 7103 ± 1576 regenerated axons respectively. Both the ANA and ANA-VEGF groups had significantly fewer regenerated axons compared to the isograft (p < 0.05) with 5225 ± 2994 and 5709 ± 2657 regenerated axons, respectively. The ANA and ANA-VEGF groups also had significantly reduced fiber density and percent nerve compared to the isograft; the isograft and ANA-SC groups were not significantly different (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThese results show that SCs improve axonal regeneration in a 20 mm ANA to a greater extent than VEGF. VEGF treatment showed a trend toward increased axonal regeneration but was not significantly different compared to the untreated ANA. The role of VEGF may be clearer in longer grafts where ischemia is a greater factor.

Indexed as

Nerve allograftsNerve graftsNerve regenerationPeripheral nerveSchwann cellVascular endothelial growth factorVEGF

Identifiers

PMID26330769
PMCPMC4551644
OpenAlexW2039122179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.