ReviewTransactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association2015
Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?
Review in Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender Segregation in Medicine: The Impact of Stereotypes on Speciality Perceptions and Choices.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
- Leadership avoidance as a rational choice among women instructors in higher education: cross-cultural parallels.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of gender bias in thoracic surgery in Türkiye: A descriptive study.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2025Article
- Beyond the Scores: Gendered Interpretations of Emergency Medicine Resident Assessments of Interdependent Performances.Perspectives on medical education · 2025Article
- Language Matters: Is There Gender Bias in Internal Medicine Grand Rounds Introductions?Cureus · 2024Article
- Gender as a social and structural variable: research perspectives from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Gender bias in pediatric care: Health professionals' opinions and perceptions.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Impact of Gender Inequity on Women Surgeons in the Professional Setting.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023Review
- Identifying Gender-Related Differences in Graduate Medical Education with the Use of a Web-Based Professionalism Monitoring Tool.Southern medical journal · 2023Article
- A qualitative insight into researchers' perceptions of gender inequality in medical and dental research institutions in Nigeria.PloS one · 2023Article
- Representation of women and underrepresented minorities among grand rounds speakers in orthopaedic surgery.Surgery in practice and science · 2022Article
- 'I felt forced to find an alternative': a qualitative analysis of women medical educators' narratives of career transitions.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Recognizing and Mitigating Gender Bias in Medical Teaching Assessments.Journal of graduate medical education · 2022Article
- Gendered Expectations: the Impact of Gender, Evaluation Language, and Clinical Setting on Resident Trainee Assessment of Faculty Performance.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Creating work environments where people of all genders in gynecologic oncology can thrive: An SGO evidence-based review.Gynecologic oncology · 2022Review
- "I may be essential but someone has to look after my kids": women physicians and COVID-19.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022Article
- Article
- Implicit gender-career bias in postgraduate medical training still exists, mainly in residents and in females.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Advancing gender equity in medicine.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021Article
- How Relevant is Obstetrician and Gynecologist Gender to Women in Saudi Arabia?International journal of women's health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This article reviews some of our research on how gender stereotypes and their accompanying assumptions and expectations can influence the careers of male and female physicians and scientists in a myriad of subtle ways. Although stereotype-based cognitive biases may be invisible and unintentional, they nevertheless shape the experiences of women in academic medicine in ways that frequently constrain their opportunities. We present research on the following: 1) subtle differences in the evaluation of male and female medical students as revealed through text analysis of written evaluations at a critical career juncture, 2) how cultural assumptions about the way men and women should and should not behave influence medical residents' experiences as leaders, and 3) how approaching gender bias among faculty in academic medicine, science, and engineering as a remedial habit can be successful in changing individual behaviors and in improving department climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26330674PMC4530686W2412660773What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.