Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26330300›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational rehabilitation2016

Interpersonal Responses and Pain Management Within the US Military.

Cindy A McGeary, Tabatha H Blount, Alan L Peterson, Robert J Gatchel, Willie J Hale, Donald D McGeary

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cindy A McGearyDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, STRONG STAR, 7550 IH-10 West, Suite 1325, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. mcgearyc@uthscsa.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9506-9550
Tabatha H BlountDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, STRONG STAR, 7550 IH-10 West, Suite 1325, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Alan L PetersonDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, STRONG STAR, 7550 IH-10 West, Suite 1325, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Robert J GatchelDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Willie J HaleDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, STRONG STAR, 7550 IH-10 West, Suite 1325, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Donald D McGearyDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, STRONG STAR, 7550 IH-10 West, Suite 1325, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Chronic pain poses a significant problem for the US military. The benefits of self-management treatments for chronic pain are well-documented, but interpersonal responses also influence physical and psychological health and may not be addressed through self-management treatments alone. The current study examines whether perceived interpersonal responses to pain, as measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), change as a result of participation in an intensive pain management program. It was hypothesized that interpersonal responses to pain would be significantly correlated to psychosocial and physical pain outcomes and that interpersonal responses to pain would change significantly for completers of a functional restoration (FR) program compared to those who were randomized to treatment-as-usual in the military medical system. Methods Forty-four participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One treatment group received FR (n = 26) and the other group received treatment-as-usual (n = 18). Significant other responses to chronic pain were measured by the MPI (Pain 23(4):345-356, 1985). Participants also completed measures of impacted quality of life, reported disability, psychological distress, fear avoidance, pain interference, and physical activity. Results Perceived higher punishing responses from a significant other were significantly related to worse physical health-related quality of life (p = .037), work-related fear avoidance (p = .008), pain interference (p = .026), affective distress (p = .039), and pain while lifting (p = .017). Perceived higher solicitous responses from significant others were significantly associated with lower mental health-related quality of life (p = .011), household activity (p = 017), general activity (p = .042), self-reported disability (p = .030), lifting capacity (p = .005), and aerobic capacity (p = .009). Conclusions While findings are preliminary and of limited scope, it appears that the perception of significant others' responses may be impacted by psychosocial and physical pain outcomes and may change after treatment. More work in this area is needed to uncover the benefits one might achieve when a significant other is included within the FR treatment framework.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyInterpersonal RelationsPain ManagementQuality of LifeAdultChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelPersons with DisabilitiesTreatment OutcomeCognitive behavioral therapyMilitary personnelPain managementRehabilitationSocial support

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.