Trial reportBMC medical education2015
Introducing global health into the undergraduate medical school curriculum using an e-learning program: a mixed method pilot study.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2022Pooled it
- Virtual global health in graduate medical education: a systematic review.International journal of medical education · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Use of e-learning in clinical clerkships: effects on acquisition of dermatological knowledge and learning processes.International journal of medical education · 2018Trial
- Feasibility and acceptability of e-learning training about diabetes and insulin usage to Peruvian healthcare professionals.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Codeveloping a Novel Intervention to Promote the Well-Being of Family Caregivers of Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Control Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Conceptual frameworks, competencies, contents and teaching methods in planetary health education for health students and professionals: a global systematic scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Framework for implementing asylum seekers and refugees' health into the undergraduate medical curriculum in the United Kingdom.Health education research · 2024Review
- Assessing trainee critical thinking skills using a novel interactive online learning tool.Medical education online · 2023Article
- Review
- Integrating Public Health Into Undergraduate Medicine in North America: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Internationalization of Medical Education - Motivations and Formats of Current Practices.Medical science educator · 2022Review
- Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
- The Hip Instructional Prehabilitation Program for Enhanced Recovery (HIPPER) as an eHealth Approach to Presurgical Hip Replacement Education: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Caring for refugees and asylum seekers in Canada: Early experiences and comprehensive global health training for medical students.Canadian medical education journal · 2020Article
- The feasibility and satisfaction of an online global health education course at a single medical school: a retrospective study.Korean journal of medical education · 2020Article
- A global health capstone: an innovative educational approach in a competency-based curriculum for medical students.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- A scoping review of social determinants of health curricula in post-graduate medical education.Canadian medical education journal · 2019Article
- Building capacity for medical education research in family medicine: the Program for Innovation in Medical Education (PIME).Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysicians need global health competencies to provide effective care to culturally and linguistically diverse patients. Medical schools are seeking innovative approaches to support global health learning. This pilot study evaluated e-learning versus peer-reviewed articles to improve conceptual knowledge of global health.
methodsA mixed methods study using a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) and qualitative inquiry consisting of four post-intervention focus groups. Outcomes included pre/post knowledge quiz and self-assessment measures based on validated tools from a Global Health CanMEDS Competency Model. RCT results were analyzed using SPSS-21 and focus group transcripts coded using NVivo-9 and recoded using thematic analysis.
resultsOne hundred and sixty-one pre-clerkship medical students from three Canadian medical schools participated in 2012-2013: 59 completed all elements of the RCT, 24 participated in the focus groups. Overall, comparing pre to post results, both groups showed a significant increase in the mean knowledge (quiz) scores and for 5/7 self-assessed competencies (p < 0.05). These quantitative data were triangulated with the focus groups findings that revealed knowledge acquisition with both approaches. There was no statistically significant difference between the two approaches. Participants highlighted their preference for e-learning to introduce new global health knowledge and as a repository of resources. They also mentioned personal interest in global health, online convenience and integration into the curriculum as incentives to complete the e-learning. Beta version e-learning barriers included content overload and technical difficulties.
conclusionsBoth the e-learning and the peer reviewed PDF articles improved global health conceptual knowledge. Many students however, preferred e-learning given its interactive, multi-media approach, access to links and reference materials and its capacity to engage and re-engage over long periods of time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.