Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26329930›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2015

The phenotypic signature of adaptation to thermal stress in Escherichia coli.

Shaun M Hug, Brandon S Gaut

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evolution of pH-sensitive transcription termination inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Experimental Evolution in a Warming World: The Omics Era.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolution Under Thermal Stress AffectsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Epistasis decreases with increasing antibiotic pressure but not temperature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaun M HugDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UC Irvine, 321 Steinhaus Hall, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. shug@uci.edu.
Brandon S GautDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UC Irvine, 321 Steinhaus Hall, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. bgaut@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Mathematical, Computational and Systems BiologyT32EB009418 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LANDER, ARTHUR D, NIE, QING · 2009 to 2019
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the short-term, organisms acclimate to stress through phenotypic plasticity, but in the longer term they adapt to stress genetically. The mutations that accrue during adaptation may contribute to completely novel phenotypes, or they may instead act to restore the phenotype from a stressed to a pre-stress condition. To better understand the influence of evolution on the diversity and direction of phenotypic change, we used Biolog microarrays to assay 94 phenotypes of 115 Escherichia coli clones that had adapted to high temperature (42.2 °C). We also assayed these same phenotypes in the clones' ancestor under non-stress (37.0 °C) and stress (42.2 °C) conditions. We explored associations between Biolog phenotypes and genotypes, and we also investigated phenotypic differences between clones that have one of two adaptive genetic trajectories: one that is typified by mutations in the RNA polymerase β-subunit (rpoB) and another that is defined by mutations in the rho termination factor.

resultsMost (54 %) phenotypic variation was restorative, shifting the phenotype from the acclimated state back toward the unstressed state. Novel phenotypes were more rare, comprising between 5 and 18 % of informative phenotypic variation. Phenotypic variation associated statistically with genetic variation, demonstrating a genetic basis for phenotypic change. Finally, clones with rpoB mutations differed in phenotype from those with rho mutations, largely due to differences in chemical sensitivity.

conclusionsOur results contribute to previous observations showing that a major component of adaptation in microbial evolution experiments is toward restoration to the unstressed state. In addition, we found that a large deletion strongly affected phenotypic variation. Finally, we demonstrated that the two genetic trajectories leading to thermal adaptation encompass different phenotypes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGenetic VariationHeat-Shock ResponseHot TemperatureMutationPhenotypeDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coli ProteinsRho protein, E colirpoB protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID26329930
PMCPMC4557228
OpenAlexW1787347804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.