Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26329805›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2016

Perspectives of the public on reducing population salt intake in Ireland.

Áine Regan, Christine Liran Shan, Patrick Wall, Áine McConnon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Sodium salt substitution for blood pressure in adults with diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Barriers, Enablers, and Perceptions on Dietary Salt Reduction in the Out-of-Home Sectors: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Áine Regan1School of Public Health,Physiotherapy, & Population Science,University College Dublin,Belfield,Dublin 4,Republic of Ireland.
Christine Liran Shan1School of Public Health,Physiotherapy, & Population Science,University College Dublin,Belfield,Dublin 4,Republic of Ireland.
Patrick Wall1School of Public Health,Physiotherapy, & Population Science,University College Dublin,Belfield,Dublin 4,Republic of Ireland.
Áine McConnon2Avila Research,Dublin,Republic of Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs countries struggle to meet the set targets for population salt intake, there have been calls for more regulated approaches to reducing dietary salt intake. However, little is known about how the public perceives various salt reduction policies; an important line of investigation given that the implementation and success of these policies often depend on public sentiment. We investigated the attitudes and beliefs of consumers towards salt reduction and their support for thirteen different government-led salt reduction policies.

designA cross-sectional online survey measured participants' knowledge, beliefs and attitudes in relation to salt reduction.

settingThe survey was carried out with participants from the Republic of Ireland. SUBJECTS: Five hundred and one participants recruited via a market research agency completed the survey.

resultsWe found that the vast majority of participants supported eleven of the government-led salt reduction policies, which included measures such as education, labelling and salt restriction in foods (both voluntary and regulated, across a range of settings). The two proposed fiscal policies (subsidising low-salt foods and taxing high-salt foods) received less support in comparison, with the majority of participants opposed to a tax on high-salt foods. A series of multiple regressions revealed that individual attitudes and beliefs related to health and salt were stronger predictors of support than sociodemographic factors, lifestyle or knowledge.

conclusionsThe study provides an important evidence base from which policy makers may draw when making decisions on future policy steps to help achieve national salt targets.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedChoice BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, Sodium-RestrictedFemaleFood PreferencesGovernmentHumansIrelandLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedNutrition PolicySodium Chloride, DietaryGovernmentHealth policyPublic opinionSalt reduction

Identifiers

PMID26329805
PMCPMC10270914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.