Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26329745›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2015

Testing measurement equivalence of the SF-36 questionnaire across patients on hemodialysis and healthy people.

Zahra Bagheri, Peyman Jafari, Marjan Faghih, Elahe Allahyari, Tania Dehesh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Item Response Analysis of the Financial Capacity Instrument-Short Form.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Comparison of longitudinal quality of life outcomes in preemptive and dialyzed patients on waiting list for kidney transplantation.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Differences in quality of life between Jewish and Arab patients on hemodialysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The importance of considering differential item functioning in investigating the impact of chronic conditions on health-related quality of life in a multi-ethnic Asian population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zahra BagheriDepartment of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Peyman JafariDepartment of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. jafarip@sums.ac.ir.
Marjan FaghihDepartment of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Elahe AllahyariDepartment of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Tania DeheshDepartment of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferential item functioning (DIF) occurs when members from different groups respond differently to particular items in a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire after controlling for underlying HRQoL construct. This study aimed to assess DIF in the SF-36 questionnaire and its effect on comparing HRQoL scores across patients on HD and healthy people.

methodsOne hundred fifty patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and 642 healthy individuals filled out the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire. Multiple-group multiple-indicator multiple-causes (MG-MIMIC) model was used to assess DIF across patients on HD and healthy population.

resultsSixteen out of 36 (44.4 %) items were flagged with DIF. Six out of 16 items (37.5 %) were flagged with uniform DIF, nine items (56.2 %) with non-uniform DIF, and one item (6.2 %) with both uniform DIF and non-uniform DIF. DIF items were associated with all subscales with the exception of the limitation due to physical problems and bodily pain subscales. The significant lower HRQoL scores of patients on HD in comparison with healthy people in the physical functioning and vitality subscales did not change after removing the items with uniform DIF.

conclusionsOur findings revealed that patients on HD and healthy people perceived the meaning of the items in SF-36 questionnaire differently. Although the impact of DIF is minimal, the cross-group comparison across patients on HD and healthy people should be performed with caution.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRenal DialysisSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedComprehensionFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionRenal Insufficiency, ChronicDifferential item functioningHealthy populationPatients on hemodialysisQuality of lifeSF-36

Identifiers

PMID26329745
OpenAlexW1247151781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.