ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2016
Effect of feline skin specimen preparation on postexcision and postfixation tissue shrinkage.
Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-Shrinkage Technique for Feline Skin Samples.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of a New Skin Fixation Technique to Avoid Shrinkage of Skin Samples Obtained from Canine Cadavers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Quantification of Canine Apocrine Gland Anal Sac Adenocarcinoma (AGASACA) Tumor Specimen Shrinkage after Formalin Fixation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Histologic processing artifacts and inter-pathologist variation in measurement of inked margins of canine mast cell tumors.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study was performed to assess skin-muscle-fascia specimen shrinkage and donor site changes, and to compare three techniques of specimen preparation for their effect on specimen shrinkage postexcision and after formalin fixation in feline cadaveric specimens.
methodsFifteen fresh feline cadavers were used for this study. Gelatin spheres were implanted in paired thoracic subcutaneous pockets and subsequently excised with 30 mm lateral margins and a fascial plane as the deep margin. Skin and fascia were either left unsutured, sutured together using four simple interrupted quadrant sutures ('four-quadrant-sutured') or sutured together in a continuous pattern ('circumferentially sutured'). Specimens were measured for tumor-free margins on the excised and fixed specimens. The donor site defect was assessed for enlargement after specimen excision. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the donor site enlargement, and the influence of preparation technique on margin size, with significance set at P <0.05.
resultsThe closest skin margins on the excised and fixed specimens were significantly smaller than the planned 30 mm margins; however, no significant difference was found between postexcision and postfixation specimens. No significant differences were found between the three techniques (P = 0.74) with regard to margins either after excision or fixation. The fascial and skin defects of the donor site were significantly larger than the planned excision. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Surgically obtained feline skin-muscle-fascia specimens will significantly decrease in size prior to formalin fixation, resulting in falsely decreased measurements from tumor to tissue margins. Affixing the skin to the fascia does not significantly influence this decrease in margin size in feline tissue specimens at this location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.