Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26329723›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2016

Effect of feline skin specimen preparation on postexcision and postfixation tissue shrinkage.

Marije Risselada, Kyle G Mathews, Emily Griffith

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Histologic processing artifacts and inter-pathologist variation in measurement of inked margins of canine mast cell tumors.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marije RisseladaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Veterinary Health Complex, Raleigh, NC, USA marije_risselada@ncsu.edu.
Kyle G MathewsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Veterinary Health Complex, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Emily GriffithDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Veterinary Health Complex, Raleigh, NC, USA.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study was performed to assess skin-muscle-fascia specimen shrinkage and donor site changes, and to compare three techniques of specimen preparation for their effect on specimen shrinkage postexcision and after formalin fixation in feline cadaveric specimens.

methodsFifteen fresh feline cadavers were used for this study. Gelatin spheres were implanted in paired thoracic subcutaneous pockets and subsequently excised with 30 mm lateral margins and a fascial plane as the deep margin. Skin and fascia were either left unsutured, sutured together using four simple interrupted quadrant sutures ('four-quadrant-sutured') or sutured together in a continuous pattern ('circumferentially sutured'). Specimens were measured for tumor-free margins on the excised and fixed specimens. The donor site defect was assessed for enlargement after specimen excision. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the donor site enlargement, and the influence of preparation technique on margin size, with significance set at P <0.05.

resultsThe closest skin margins on the excised and fixed specimens were significantly smaller than the planned 30 mm margins; however, no significant difference was found between postexcision and postfixation specimens. No significant differences were found between the three techniques (P = 0.74) with regard to margins either after excision or fixation. The fascial and skin defects of the donor site were significantly larger than the planned excision. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Surgically obtained feline skin-muscle-fascia specimens will significantly decrease in size prior to formalin fixation, resulting in falsely decreased measurements from tumor to tissue margins. Affixing the skin to the fascia does not significantly influence this decrease in margin size in feline tissue specimens at this location.

Indexed as

AnimalsCadaverCatsFasciaFemaleHistological TechniquesMuscle, SkeletalSkinSpecimen HandlingTissue Fixation

Identifiers

PMID26329723
PMCPMC11112235
OpenAlexW1931624056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.