Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26329648›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Do MRI findings identify patients with low back pain or sciatica who respond better to particular interventions? A systematic review.

Daniel Steffens, Mark J Hancock, Leani S M Pereira, Peter M Kent, Jane Latimer, Chris G Maher

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Are current machine learning applications comparable to radiologist classification of degenerate and herniated discs and Modic change? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2017: Automation of reading of radiological features from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the lumbar spine without human intervention is comparable with an expert radiologist.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel SteffensMusculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box M201, Missenden Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia. dsteffens@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Mark J HancockDiscipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Leani S M PereiraDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Peter M KentDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jane LatimerMusculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box M201, Missenden Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Chris G MaherMusculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box M201, Missenden Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUMacquarie University · AURegion of Southern Denmark · DKThe George Institute for Global Health · AUUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reveal a range of degenerative findings and anatomical abnormalities; however, the clinical importance of these remains uncertain and controversial. We aimed to investigate if the presence of MRI findings identifies patients with low back pain (LBP) or sciatica who respond better to particular interventions.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched. We included RCTs investigating MRI findings as treatment effect modifiers for patients with LBP or sciatica. We excluded studies with specific diseases as the cause of LBP. Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Each MRI finding was examined for its individual capacity for effect modification.

resultsEight published trials met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of trials was inconsistent. Substantial variability in MRI findings, treatments and outcomes across the eight trials prevented pooling of data. Patients with Modic type 1 when compared with patients with Modic type 2 had greater improvements in function when treated by Diprospan (steroid) injection, compared with saline. Patients with central disc herniation when compared with patients without central disc herniation had greater improvements in pain when treated by surgery, compared with rehabilitation.

conclusionsAlthough individual trials suggested that some MRI findings might be effect modifiers for specific interventions, none of these interactions were investigated in more than a single trial. High quality, adequately powered trials investigating MRI findings as effect modifiers are essential to determine the clinical importance of MRI findings in LBP and sciatica ( PROSPERO: CRD42013006571).

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBetamethasoneDrug CombinationsHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLow Back PainMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisSciaticaAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBetamethasonebetamethasone dipropionate, betamethasone sodium phosphate drug combinationDrug CombinationsLow back painMagnetic resonance imagingRandomised controlled trialSciaticaSubgroup analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26329648
OpenAlexW1210445675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.