Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26329584›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2016

Bifurcation treatment with novel, highly flexible drug-eluting coronary stents in all-comers: 2-year outcome in patients of the DUTCH PEERS trial.

Liefke C van der Heijden, Marlies M Kok, Ming Kai Lam, Peter W Danse, Alexander R Schramm, Gillian A J Jessurun, R Melvyn Tjon Joe Gin, K Gert van Houwelingen, Raymond W M Hautvast, Gerard C M Linssen and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The 2010s in clinical drug-eluting stent and bioresorbable scaffold research: a Dutch perspective.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Liefke C van der HeijdenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Marlies M KokDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Ming Kai LamDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Peter W DanseDepartment of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Alexander R SchrammDepartment of Cardiology, Scheper Hospital, Emmen, The Netherlands.
Gillian A J JessurunDepartment of Cardiology, Scheper Hospital, Emmen, The Netherlands.
R Melvyn Tjon Joe GinDepartment of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
K Gert van HouwelingenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Raymond W M HautvastDepartment of Cardiology, Medisch Centrum Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Gerard C M LinssenDepartment of Cardiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands.
Hanim SenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Marije M LöwikDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Maarten J IJzermanDepartment Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA-Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Carine J M DoggenDepartment Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA-Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Clemens von BirgelenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, 7513 ER, Enschede, The Netherlands. c.vonbirgelen@mst.nl.
Medisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity of Twente · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLTreant Zorggroep · NLMedisch Centrum Alkmaar · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcated lesions with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) was associated with increased myocardial infarction (MI) rates. Flexible stent designs that accommodate well to vessel tapering may be of benefit in challenging anatomies such as bifurcated target lesions, but so far data are scarce.

methodsWe analyzed the 2-year follow-up data of the DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) trial, which randomized 1811 all-comer patients to PCI with newer generation resolute integrity zotarolimus-eluting (Medtronic) or promus element everolimus-eluting stents (Boston Scientific). In bifurcated lesions, provisional stenting was generally performed. Target vessel failure is a composite endpoint, consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or target vessel revascularization.

resultsPatients with at least one bifurcated lesion (n = 465, 25.7 %) versus patients with non-bifurcated target lesions only (n = 1346, 74.3 %) showed similar rates of clinical endpoints including target vessel failure (9.2 versus 7.9 %, p = 0.36) and definite stent thrombosis (0.4 versus 1.0 %, p = 0.38). Target vessel MI was more common in patients with bifurcated lesions (3.4 versus 1.6 %, p = 0.02); but after multivariate analysis with propensity score adjustment, bifurcation treatment was found not to be an independent predictor of target vessel MI (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 0.71-2.76; p = 0.34). Among patients with bifurcated lesions, DES type and side-branch size did not affect outcome, but periprocedural MI occurred more often after two-stent approaches (9.0 versus 2.1 %; p = 0.002).

conclusionAll-comer patients treated for bifurcated and non-bifurcated target lesions showed similar and low rates of clinical endpoints, suggesting that the DES used are efficacious and safe for treating bifurcated target lesions.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsAgedCardiovascular AgentsCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary ThrombosisEverolimusFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionNetherlandsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProportional Hazards ModelsProsthesis DesignCardiovascular AgentsEverolimusSirolimuszotarolimusBifurcation/coronary bifurcationDrug-eluting stents (DES)DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) randomized clinical trialPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Promus element platinum–chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PE-PtCr-EES)Resolute integrity cobalt–chromium zotarolimus-eluting stent (RI-CoCr-ZES)

Identifiers

PMID26329584
PMCPMC4759225
OpenAlexW1798728187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.