Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26329102›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2015

A qualitative interview study on the positive well-being of medical school faculty in their teaching role: job demands, job resources and role interaction.

J W van den Berg, C P M Verberg, J J Berkhout, M J M H Lombarts, A J J A Scherpbier, A D C Jaarsma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of faculty well-being on medical student education.Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Optimizing teacher basic need satisfaction in distributed healthcare contexts.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2021
    Article
  8. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) Medical Educators Institute: a Pilot Faculty Development Project for Hematology Educators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J W van den BergCenter for Evidence-Based Education, Academic Medical Center-University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, Room J1A-138, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.w.vandenberg@amc.nl.
C P M VerbergCenter for Evidence-Based Education, Academic Medical Center-University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, Room J1A-138, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.verberg@amc.nl.
J J BerkhoutCenter for Evidence-Based Education, Academic Medical Center-University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, Room J1A-138, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.j.berkhout@amc.nl.
M J M H LombartsCenter for Evidence-Based Education, Academic Medical Center-University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, Room J1A-138, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.j.lombarts@amc.nl.
A J J A ScherpbierFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. a.scherpbier@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
A D C JaarsmaCenter for Research and Innovation in Medical Education, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.d.c.jaarsma@umcg.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttention for the well-being of medical school faculty is not only important for the prevention of attrition and burnout, but may also boost performance in their tasks in medical education. Positive well-being can be conceptualized as work engagement and this is associated with increased performance. In this study we explore how demands and resources from different tasks affect work engagement specifically for education.

methodsBetween June and September 2013, we conducted a multisite semi-structured interview study with a diverse group of medical school faculty and used an open-coding strategy within the Work Engagement Model on the transcribed interviews.

resultsWe interviewed 16 faculty members whose teaching experience ranged from 7 to 38 years and whose professional tasks ranged from being solely an educator to being a physician, researcher, educator and administrator simultaneously. All participants were clear on the perceived demands and resources, although similar aspects of the work environment could be perceived oppositely between participants. Overarching themes were perceptions related to the organization or department, often described as a general and long-term effect and perceptions directly related to a task, often described as a direct and short-term effect on well-being. Furthermore, the demands and resources as resultant of fulfilling multiple tasks were described clearly by participants.

conclusionsThe ambiguous nature of the work environment in terms of demands and resources requires an individualized approach to supporting work engagement. Furthermore, faculty members perceive many resources from fulfilling multiple tasks in relation to their tasks in education. Faculty developers and administrators alike could use these findings to apply the concept of work engagement to their daily support of faculty in medical education.

Indexed as

Schools, MedicalCareer MobilityFacultyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicJob SatisfactionMalePhysiciansProfessional PracticeResearchTeachingTime FactorsWorkload

Identifiers

PMID26329102
PMCPMC4556414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.