Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26328996›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2015

Local curvature analysis for classifying breast tumors: Preliminary analysis in dedicated breast CT.

Juhun Lee, Robert M Nishikawa, Ingrid Reiser, John M Boone, Karen K Lindfors

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juhun LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Robert M NishikawaDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Ingrid ReiserDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
John M BooneDepartment of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California 95817.
Karen K LindforsDepartment of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California 95817.

Funding

Quantitative Evaluation of Reconstruction Algorithms - Resubmission 01R21EB015053 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NISHIKAWA, ROBERT M · 2012 to 2013
$417k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB015053NIBIB NIH HHS R21-EB015053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of local curvature measures as novel image features for classifying breast tumors.

methodsA total of 119 breast lesions from 104 noncontrast dedicated breast computed tomography images of women were used in this study. Volumetric segmentation was done using a seed-based segmentation algorithm and then a triangulated surface was extracted from the resulting segmentation. Total, mean, and Gaussian curvatures were then computed. Normalized curvatures were used as classification features. In addition, traditional image features were also extracted and a forward feature selection scheme was used to select the optimal feature set. Logistic regression was used as a classifier and leave-one-out cross-validation was utilized to evaluate the classification performances of the features. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC, area under curve) was used as a figure of merit.

resultsAmong curvature measures, the normalized total curvature (CT) showed the best classification performance (AUC of 0.74), while the others showed no classification power individually. Five traditional image features (two shape, two margin, and one texture descriptors) were selected via the feature selection scheme and its resulting classifier achieved an AUC of 0.83. Among those five features, the radial gradient index (RGI), which is a margin descriptor, showed the best classification performance (AUC of 0.73). A classifier combining RGI and CT yielded an AUC of 0.81, which showed similar performance (i.e., no statistically significant difference) to the classifier with the above five traditional image features. Additional comparisons in AUC values between classifiers using different combinations of traditional image features and CT were conducted. The results showed that CT was able to replace the other four image features for the classification task.

conclusionsThe normalized curvature measure contains useful information in classifying breast tumors. Using this, one can reduce the number of features in a classifier, which may result in more robust classifiers for different datasets.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMammography

Identifiers

PMID26328996
PMCPMC4552705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.