Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26328800›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015

Novel approach to dynamic knee laxity measurement using capacitive strain gauges.

Martin Zens, Philipp Niemeyer, Anke Bernstein, Matthias J Feucht, Jan Kühle, Norbert P Südkamp, Peter Woias, Herrmann O Mayr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Digital measurement of anterolateral knee laxity using strain sensors.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin ZensDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. martin.zens@imtek.uni-freiburg.de.
Philipp NiemeyerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Anke BernsteinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Matthias J FeuchtDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Jan KühleDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Norbert P SüdkampDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Peter WoiasDepartment of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Georges-Koehler-Allee 102, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
Herrmann O MayrDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKnee joint laxities are observed in patients after severe trauma to the joint, resulting in ligament tears. Specifically, injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament may cause a significant instability. The degree of these laxities is essential in diagnostics and may affect which treatment option is suggested.

methodsPolydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) strain gauges are proposed as a non-invasive, highly accurate and easy-to-use measurement method to quantify anterolateral and rotational laxities of the knee joint during active and passive motion. In this work, proof-of-concept measurements and a prototype of the proposed device are displayed. The measurements were taken using a knee test rig, which has specifically been designed for this purpose. This apparatus allows the simulation of isolated knee joint instabilities with a motor-controlled model of a human knee.

resultsThe absolute sensitivity [Formula: see text] of an exemplary sensor was determined to be 2.038 [Formula: see text]; the relative sensitivity [Formula: see text] was 1.121 [Formula: see text]. Optimal positions of sensors to capture bone-to-bone displacement as projected displacement on the skin were identified.

conclusionPDMS strain gauges are capable of measuring bone-to-bone displacements on the skin. We present an experimental in vitro study using an artificial knee test rig to simulate knee joint laxities and display the feasibility of our novel measurement approach.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalStress, MechanicalArthrometry, ArticularBiomechanical PhenomenaDimethylpolysiloxanesHumansJoint InstabilityKnee JointbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesACL rupturesJoint displacement measurementKnee jointLaxitiesPivot shiftStrain gauges

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.