Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2016
Feasibility of monitoring stress using skin conduction measurements during intubation of newborns.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the safety of using propofol for paediatric procedural sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Pooled it
- Pain Assessment During Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Using Skin Conductance: A Prospective Cohort Study.Pediatric research · 2026Observational
- Biomarkers for assessing pain and pain relief in the neonatal intensive care unit.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Transdermal Maltose-Based Microneedle Patch as Adjunct to Enhance Topical Anesthetic before Intravenous Cannulation of Pediatric Thalassemic Patients Receiving Blood Transfusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of monitoring stress responses in newborns during naso-tracheal intubation after two different premedication regimens, using skin conductance measurements (SCM). Twenty-two newborns were randomised and premedicated with morphine + vecuronium or propofol. SCM (peaks/s) were collected prior to, during and after the procedure. Threshold for interpreting responses as stressful was 0.21 peaks/s. Intubation conditions and physiological parameters were registered. Intubation conditions were good in all newborns. Administration of morphine (range 1.4-10.3 min) before administration of vecuronium did not affect SCM when a stressful stimulus was applied. Within 1.6 min (range 0.8-3 min) after administration of vecuronium, SCM disappeared in 10 of 11 newborns. Propofol reduced SCM in 10 of 11 newborns at the first attempt. Further attempts were associated with increasing SCM, mostly above a threshold of 0.21 peaks/s. There were no significant changes in physiological parameters during the procedure for either premedication regimen.
conclusionThe variation in SCM between individual newborns limits the usefulness of SCM as stress monitor during intubation. The use of neuromuscular blockers for premedication precludes monitoring of SCM completely in newborns. WHAT IS KNOWN: Skin conductance measurements have been used successfully to monitor pain in awake newborn infants. WHAT IS NEW: Premedicated newborns display significant interindividual variation in skin conductance measurements during an intubation procedure. Neuromuscular blockade causes skin conductance measurements to disappear completely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.