Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26328771›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2015

Barriers to the sustainability of an intervention designed to improve patient engagement within NHS mental health rehabilitation units: a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial.

Melanie Lean, Gerard Leavey, Helen Killaspy, Nicholas Green, Isobel Harrison, Sarah Cook, Thomas Craig, Frank Holloway, Maurice Arbuthnott, Michael King

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie LeanDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. m.lean@ucl.ac.uk.
Gerard LeaveyThe Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Ulster, Magee Campus, Londonderry, BT48 7JL, UK. g.leavey@ulster.ac.uk.
Helen KillaspyRehabilitation Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. h.killaspy@ucl.ac.uk.
Nicholas GreenDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. nicholas.green@ucl.ac.uk.
Isobel HarrisonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. isobel.harrison@ucl.ac.uk.
Sarah CookOccupational Therapy, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Montgomery House, 32 Collegiate Crescent, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. S.P.Cook@shu.ac.uk.
Thomas CraigSocial Psychiatry, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, SE5 8AZ, UK. thomas.craig@kcl.ac.uk.
Frank HollowaySouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK. f.holloway1@gmail.com.
Maurice ArbuthnottNorth London Service User Research Forum, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. mauricea@easy.com.
Michael KingPrimary Care Psychiatry and Joint-Director, UCL PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. michael.king@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBCentre for Mental Health · GBKing's College London · GBMaudsley Hospital · GBSheffield Hallam University · GBUK Health Forum · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe undertook a cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a staff training intervention to improve patient engagement in activities in inpatient mental health rehabilitation units. Concurrently, we undertook a qualitative study to investigate the experiences of staff within the intervention units and the contextual issues that may have influenced the effectiveness of the intervention.

methodWe conducted focus groups with staff working in the inpatient units that received the intervention, sampled using a maximum variation strategy.

resultsThe intervention was accepted by staff. However, the skills gained, and changes to the unit's processes and structures that were agreed with the intervention team were not sustained after they left. The main reasons for this were a) external factors (economic recession, resource limitations); b) organisation level factors (lack of senior staff support; competing priorities); c) limitations of the intervention itself (length of intensive training period; reinforcement of skills).

conclusionThis study illustrates some of the inter-related factors which operate at different levels within and outside of NHS organisations that may impact on the success of complex interventions. These factors need to be considered when designing interventions to ensure adequate buy-in from senior staff.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN25898179 (Registered 23 April 2010).

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationClinical CompetenceEnglandFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHealth PrioritiesHospitalizationHospitals, PsychiatricHumansInpatientsInservice TrainingInterprofessional RelationsLeadershipMental HealthPatient Care PlanningPsychiatric Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID26328771
PMCPMC4556020
OpenAlexW2146693763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.