ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2015
Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Models optimized for real-world tasks reveal the task-dependent necessity of precise temporal coding in hearing.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Models optimized for real-world tasks reveal the task-dependent necessity of precise temporal coding in hearing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Evaluating Spatial Hearing Using a Dual-Task Approach in a Virtual-Acoustics Environment.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neurons in primary auditory cortex represent sound source location in a cue-invariant manner.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Spatial variation in signal and sensory precision both constrain auditory acuity at high frequencies.Hearing research · 2018Article
- Multisensory stimuli improve relative localisation judgments compared to unisensory auditory or visual stimuli.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Development of a Bayesian Estimator for Audio-Visual Integration: A Neurocomputational Study.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- Simultaneous Assessment of Speech Identification and Spatial Discrimination: A Potential Testing Approach for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users?Trends in hearing · 2015Article
- An Effect of Gaze Direction in Cocktail Party Listening.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial acuity varies with sound-source azimuth, signal-to-noise ratio, and the spectral characteristics of the sound source. Here, the spatial localisation abilities of listeners were assessed using a relative localisation task. This task tested localisation ability at fixed angular separations throughout space using a two-alternative forced-choice design across a variety of listening conditions. Subjects were required to determine whether a target sound originated to the left or right of a preceding reference in the presence of a multi-source noise background. Experiment 1 demonstrated that subjects' ability to determine the relative location of two sources declined with less favourable signal-to-noise ratios and at peripheral locations. Experiment 2 assessed performance with both broadband and spectrally restricted stimuli designed to limit localisation cues to predominantly interaural level differences or interaural timing differences (ITDs). Predictions generated from topographic, modified topographic, and two-channel models of sound localisation suggest that for low-pass stimuli, where ITD cues were dominant, the two-channel model provides an adequate description of the experimental data, whereas for broadband and high frequency bandpass stimuli none of the models was able to fully account for performance. Experiment 3 demonstrated that relative localisation performance was uninfluenced by shifts in gaze direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.