Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26328226›Full record

ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2015

Financial Implications of Hospital Readmission After Hip Fracture.

Stephen L Kates, Edward Shields, Caleb Behrend, Katia K Noyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Home discharge location is safest following fracture of the hip.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Social deprivation predicts adverse health outcomes after hospital admission with hip fracture in England.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prediction of readmissions in the first post-operative year following hip fracture surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Article
  15. How does deprivation influence secondary care costs after hip fracture?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen L KatesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Edward ShieldsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Caleb BehrendDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carilion Clinic, Virginia, USA.
Katia K NoyesDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHip fracture is the leading orthopedic discharge diagnosis associated with 30-day readmission in terms of numbers. Because readmission to the hospital following a hip fracture is so common, it adds considerably to the costs on an already overburdened health care system.

methodsPatients aged 65 and older admitted to a 261-bed university-affiliated level 3 trauma center between April 30, 2005, and September 30, 2010, with a unilateral, native, nonpathologic low-energy proximal femur fracture were identified from a fracture registry and included for analysis. Readmissions within 30 days of hospital discharge, costs, and outcomes were collected and studied.

resultsOf 1081 patients, 129 (11.9%) were readmitted within 30 days. The average hospital length of stay for readmissions was 8.7 ± 18.8 days, which was significantly longer than the initial stay (4.6 ± 2.3 days) (P = .03). Nineteen percent (24 patients ∼19%) died during readmission versus 2.8% during the index admission. These patients accumulated an average hospital charge of US$16 308 ± US$6400 during their initial hospitalization for compared with charges for their readmissions of US$14 191 ± US$25 035 (P = .36). DISCUSSION: Readmission was usually associated with serious medical or surgical complications of the original hospitalization.

conclusionsReadmission after hip fracture is costly and harmful. Charges were similar between the original fracture admission and the readmission. Patients were readmitted most frequently for medical diagnoses following their original hospital stay. Some of these readmissions may have been avoidable.

Indexed as

complicationsfinancial costsgeriatric fracturehip fracturemortalityreadmission

Identifiers

PMID26328226
PMCPMC4536499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.