Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26328206›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2015

The transrectal single port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a cadaver model.

Oktay Akça, Homayoun Zargar, Riccardo Autorino, Luis Felipe Brandao, Ahmet Selçuk Gürler, Abdullah Avşar, Rahim Horuz, Selami Albayrak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oktay AkçaDepartment of Urology, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Homayoun ZargarDepartment of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, USA.
Riccardo AutorinoDepartment of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, USA.
Luis Felipe BrandaoDepartment of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, USA.
Ahmet Selçuk GürlerT.C. Ministry of Justice, Turkish Council of Forensic Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Abdullah AvşarT.C. Ministry of Justice, Turkish Council of Forensic Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Rahim HoruzDepartment of Urology, Medipol University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Selami AlbayrakDepartment of Urology, Medipol University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the feasibility of laparoscopic trans-rectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) radical prostatectomy in a cadaveric model and to define anatomical landmarks of this surgical route. MATERIALS AND

methodsAfter the ethical clearance, the study was conducted in Turkish Council of Forensic Medicine. With the cadaver in an exaggerated lithotomy position, a full thickness incision was made on the anterior wall of the rectum. The anteriorly visible Denonvilliers' fascia was incised sharply, exposing the posterior surface of the prostate. A single-port device (GelPOINT(®)Path) was inserted transanally passing the incision on the anterior wall of the rectum, into the bluntly created space between rectum and prostate. Three, 10 mm ports were placed through the GelPOINT(®)Path, at 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions. A 5 mm, 0° degree lens was introduced at 6 o'clock position; followed by laparoscopic scissors and laparoscopic grasper. Prostatic and periprostatic anatomy was defined as encountered during each step of the procedure.

resultsExposure of the posterior surface of the prostate and seminal vesicles was easily achieved. No additional openings of the rectal wall were made. Surgical specimen was extracted keeping its integrity.

conclusionTransrectal radical prostatectomy is technically feasible in the cadaver model, being facilitated by previous experience with perineal surgery. Anatomical observations during the present experimental study suggest that the transrectal NOTES route provides good exposure of the operative field and easy access to the posterior surface of prostate, Future experimental endeavors should focus on reproducibility of this approach and feasibility of lymph node dissection using trans-rectal route.

Indexed as

Laparoscopicradical prostatectomysingle porttransrectal

Identifiers

PMID26328206
PMCPMC4548668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.