Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26328195›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2015

Comparison between ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Doğan Atılgan, Yusuf Gençten, Engin Kölükçü, Şahin Kılıç, Nihat Uluocak, Bekir Süha Parlaktaş, Fikret Erdemir

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Doğan AtılganDepartment of Urology, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.
Yusuf GençtenDepartment of Urology, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.
Engin KölükçüDepartment of Urology, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.
Şahin KılıçDepartment of Urology, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.
Nihat UluocakDepartment of Urology, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.
Bekir Süha ParlaktaşDepartment of Urology, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.
Fikret ErdemirDepartment of Urology, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of oral ciprofloxacin administration and oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) regimens in preventing infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween 2011-2013, the medical records of 391 (mean age 64.62±7.64 years; range 40 to 87 years) patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsies, due to suspicion of prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. While 500 mg ciprofloxacin was given orally twice daily starting one day before the procedure, continued for 3 days in the first 174 patients (group 1); was given orally twice daily starting one day before the procedure, continued for 3 days in the remaining 217 patients (group 2) for prophylaxis. Urine samples were obtained for urine culture before the procedure. The two groups were compared with respect to findings of urine cultures performed before and after the procedure and complications.

resultsIn the ciprofloxacin and groups, any positive urine culture before the procedure was not observed. Complications occured in 93 patients (37 in group 1 and 56 in group 2), after the procedure. Twenty-two (5.6%) (11 in group 1 and 11 in group 2). patients were admitted to our clinic because of high fever occurring after biopsy. Nine ciprofloxacin-treated (5.2%) and 16 TMP-SMX-treated (7.4%) patients had severe dysuria after the procedure. Twenty-one ciprofloxacin recipients (12.1%) and 40 TMP-SMX recipients (18.4%) had macroscopic hematuria. In the ciprofloxacin and TMP-SMX groups, the incidences of new culture positivity were 4% (n=7) and 2.8% (n=6) after the procedure, respectively. All of the isolated bacteria was Escherichia coli. While 11 patients were hospitalized due to signs of complicated urinary tract infections, and 2 patients were treated as outpatients. Rectal bleeding that did not require any intervention was observed in a patient 8 hours after biopsy. SIRS findings were detected in two patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to age, prostate volume, prostate spesific antigen (PSA) levels, and results of urine culture performed after the procedure (p>0.05).

conclusionDespite the increasing resistance to antibiotics, ciprofloxacin and TMP-SMX are effective prophylactic treatment modalities for transrectal prostate biopsy. Both three-day ciprofloxacin and TMP-SMX regimens seem to be equally effective in the antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Indexed as

Ciprofloxacinprophylaxisprostate biopsytrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazoleurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID26328195
PMCPMC4548650
OpenAlexW2327563525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.