Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26327861›Full record

ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2014

Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study.

Ewelina Litwińska, Marek Nowak, Dorota Kolasa-Zwierzchowska, Anna Nowińska-Serwach, Jacek Władziński, Artur Szpakowski, Marian Szpakowski, Jacek R Wilczyński

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ewelina LitwińskaPerinatology and Gynecology Department, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Łódź, Poland.
Marek NowakGynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Łódź, Poland.
Dorota Kolasa-ZwierzchowskaGynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Łódź, Poland.
Anna Nowińska-SerwachGynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Łódź, Poland.
Jacek WładzińskiGynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Łódź, Poland.
Artur SzpakowskiGynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Łódź, Poland.
Marian SzpakowskiGynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Łódź, Poland.
Jacek R WilczyńskiGynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Łódź, Poland.
Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumors of the female reproductive system. Although the majority of myomas are asymptomatic, some patients have symptoms or signs of varying degrees and require a hysterectomy. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical results of two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective, observational study was performed at a tertiary care center: the Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute. The study period was from January 2003 to December 2012. A total of 159 women underwent either vaginal hysterectomy (VH, n = 120) or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH, n = 39) for symptomatic uterine myomas. Outcome measures, including past medical history, blood loss, major complications, operating time and discharge time were assessed and compared between the studied groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test, U-Mann Whitney test, χ(2) test and Yates'χ(2) test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThere were no differences in patients' mean age. Parity was significantly higher in the VH group (VH 1.9 ± 0.7 vs. LAVH 1.5 ± 0.8; p = 0.008). No difference was found in the mean ± standard deviation (SD) uterine volume between vaginal hysterectomy and LAVH groups (179 ± 89 vs. 199 ± 88 cm(3)), respectively. The mean operative time was significantly longer for the LAVH group (83 ± 29 vs. 131 ± 30 min; p = 0.0001). The intraoperative blood loss (VH 1.3 ± 1.1 vs. LAVH 1.4 ± 0.9 g/dl; p = 0.2) and the rate of intra- and postoperative complications were similar in both groups studied. The mean discharge time was longer for LAVH than for VH (VH 4.2 ± 1.2 vs. LAVH 5.3 ± 1.3 days, p = 0.0001).

conclusionsLaparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and VH are safe hysterectomy techniques for women with the myomatous uterus. Concerning the LAVH, the abdominal-pelvic exploration and the ability to perform adnexectomy safely represent the major advantages comparing with VH. Vaginal hysterectomy had a shorter operating time and the mild blood loss making it a suitable method of hysterectomy for cases in which the shortest duration of surgery and anesthesia is preferable.

Indexed as

laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)uterine myomasvaginal hysterectomy (VH)

Identifiers

PMID26327861
PMCPMC4520370
OpenAlexW2127407644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.