Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26327779›Full record

ArticleBiomarker insights2015

Autoantibody Profiles in Collagen Disease Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD): Antibodies to Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I-Related Chain A (MICA) as Markers of ILD.

Hiroshi Furukawa, Shomi Oka, Kota Shimada, Kiyoe Masuo, Fumiaki Nakajima, Shunichi Funano, Yuki Tanaka, Akiko Komiya, Naoshi Fukui, Tatsuya Sawasaki and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomarker insights, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Gain-Scanning for Protein Microarray Assays.Journal of proteome research · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. CF-PAScientific reports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi FurukawaClinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara, Japan. ; Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Shomi OkaClinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara, Japan. ; Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Kota ShimadaDepartment of Rheumatology, Sagamihara Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara, Japan. ; Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan.
Kiyoe MasuoTechnical Marketing Department, VERITAS Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumiaki NakajimaResearch and Development Department, Central Blood Institute, Japanese Red Cross Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunichi FunanoProteo-Medicine Research Center, Ehime University, Toon.
Yuki TanakaIntergated Center for Science, Ehime University, Toon.
Akiko KomiyaClinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara, Japan.
Naoshi FukuiClinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara, Japan.
Tatsuya SawasakiCell-Free Science and Technology Research Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan.
Kenji TadokoroResearch and Development Department, Central Blood Institute, Japanese Red Cross Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Masato NoseProteo-Medicine Research Center, Ehime University, Toon.
Naoyuki TsuchiyaMolecular and Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Shigeto TohmaClinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara, Japan.
National Sagamihara Hospital · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPEhime University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently associated with collagen disease. It is then designated as collagen vascular disease-associated ILD (CVD-ILD), and influences patients' prognosis. The prognosis of acute-onset diffuse ILD (AoDILD) occurring in patients with collagen disease is quite poor. Here, we report our investigation of auto-antibody (Ab) profiles to determine whether they may be useful in diagnosing CVD-ILD or AoDILD in collagen disease. Auto-Ab profiles were analyzed using the Lambda Array Beads Multi-Analyte System, granulocyte immunofluorescence test, Proto-Array Human Protein Microarray, AlphaScreen assay, and glutathione S-transferase capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 34 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with or without CVD-ILD and in 15 patients with collagen disease with AoDILD. The average anti-major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) Ab levels were higher in RA patients with CVD-ILD than in those without (P = 0.0013). The ratio of the average anti-MICA Ab level to the average anti-human leukocyte antigen class I Ab level (ie, MICA/Class I) was significantly higher in RA patients with CVD-ILD compared with those without (P = 4.47 × 10(-5)). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of auto-Ab profiles in CVD-ILD. The MICA/Class I ratio could be a better marker for diagnosing CVD-ILD than KL-6 (Krebs von den lungen-6).

Indexed as

anti-MICA antibodyauto-antibody profilebiological markercollagen diseaseinterstitial lung disease

Identifiers

PMID26327779
PMCPMC4539100
OpenAlexW1789299786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.