Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26327778›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2015

Assessing Treatment Response Through Generalized Pharmacokinetic Modeling of DCE-MRI Data.

Eleftherios Kontopodis, Georgia Kanli, Georgios C Manikis, Sofie Van Cauter, Kostas Marias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eleftherios KontopodisFoundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Computer Science, Computational BioMedicine Lab, Heraklion, Greece.
Georgia KanliFoundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Computer Science, Computational BioMedicine Lab, Heraklion, Greece.
Georgios C ManikisFoundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Computer Science, Computational BioMedicine Lab, Heraklion, Greece.
Sofie Van CauterDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kostas MariasFoundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Computer Science, Computational BioMedicine Lab, Heraklion, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) enables the quantification of contrast leakage from the vascular tissue by using pharmacokinetic (PK) models. Such quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI data provides physiological parameters that are able to provide information of tumor pathophysiology and therapeutic outcome. Several assumptive PK models have been proposed to characterize microcirculation in the tumoral tissue. In this paper, we present a comparative study between the well-known extended Tofts model (ETM) and the more recent gamma capillary transit time (GCTT) model, with the latter showing initial promising results in the literature. To enhance the GCTT imaging biomarkers, we introduce a novel method for segmenting the tumor area into subregions according to their vascular heterogeneity characteristics. A cohort of 11 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme with known therapeutic outcome was used to assess the predictive value of both models in terms of correctly classifying responders and nonresponders based on only one DCE-MRI examination. The results indicate that GCTT model's PK parameters perform better than those of ETM, while the segmentation of the tumor regions of interest based on vascular heterogeneity further enhances the discriminatory power of the GCTT model.

Indexed as

brain tumorDCE-MRIimaging biomarkersperfusion imagingpharmacokinetic modeling

Identifiers

PMID26327778
PMCPMC4536783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.