Observational studyJAMA2015
Integrative Clinical Sequencing in the Management of Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Youth.
Observational study in JAMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 237 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
237 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 411 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors that influence the uptake of precision-guided treatment recommendations in paediatric cancer: a systematic review.British journal of cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Management of individuals with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CHEK2: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Guideline
- Cancer Predisposition Genes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs): a Review Paper from the Italian AYA Working Group.Current oncology reports · 2022Pooled it
- Molecular-guided therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory childhood cancers: a Beat Childhood Cancer Research Consortium trial.Genome medicine · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Matched Targeted Therapy for Pediatric Patients with Relapsed, Refractory, or High-Risk Leukemias: A Report from the LEAP Consortium.Cancer discovery · 2021Trial
- The DIPG/DMG National Tumor Board: The power of advocacy.Neuro-oncology pediatrics · 2026Article
- Molecular Pathogenesis, Tumor Microenvironment and Health Disparities in Select Pediatric Solid Tumors: An Integrative Narrative Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Population-based genomic detection of childhood cancer predisposition using newborn dried blood spots.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Childhood cancer predisposition study: a prospective registry and biorepository protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Two cases of mosaic germline SVA insertions in SMARCB1: implications for rhabdoid tumour predisposition diagnosis.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Should Sickle Cell Disease Be Considered a Cancer Predisposition Syndrome?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrated Germline and Somatic Molecular Profiling to Detect Cancer Predisposition Has a High Clinical Impact in Poor-Prognosis Pediatric Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Long-Read Haplotype Phasing Resolves Allelic Configuration as a Missing Layer of Precision Oncology.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Precision Oncology for Pediatric Solid Tumors Using In-Hospital Pediatric/AYA Malignancy-Specific Panel Sequencing.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Precision medicine directed therapy enabling long-term survival in medulloblastoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Osteosarcoma 3D patient derived cultures to test genome-informed personalized treatment options: a feasibility study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Pediatric Oncology Patients With Germline Pathogenic Variants in Adult-Onset Cancer Predisposition Genes.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Targeted DNA Sequencing for Tailored Therapies in Children with Extracranial Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Germline pathogenic variation impacts somatic alterations and patient outcomes in pediatric central nervous system tumors.Nature communications · 2025Article
177 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
35 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceCancer is caused by a diverse array of somatic and germline genomic aberrations. Advances in genomic sequencing technologies have improved the ability to detect these molecular aberrations with greater sensitivity. However, integrating them into clinical management in an individualized manner has proven challenging.
objectiveTo evaluate the use of integrative clinical sequencing and genetic counseling in the assessment and treatment of children and young adults with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsSingle-site, observational, consecutive case series (May 2012-October 2014) involving 102 children and young adults (mean age, 10.6 years; median age, 11.5 years, range, 0-22 years) with relapsed, refractory, or rare cancer. EXPOSURES: Participants underwent integrative clinical exome (tumor and germline DNA) and transcriptome (tumor RNA) sequencing and genetic counseling. Results were discussed by a precision medicine tumor board, which made recommendations to families and their physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of patients with potentially actionable findings, results of clinical actions based on integrative clinical sequencing, and estimated proportion of patients or their families at risk of future cancer.
resultsOf the 104 screened patients, 102 enrolled with 91 (89%) having adequate tumor tissue to complete sequencing. Only the 91 patients were included in all calculations, including 28 (31%) with hematological malignancies and 63 (69%) with solid tumors. Forty-two patients (46%) had actionable findings that changed their cancer management: 15 of 28 (54%) with hematological malignancies and 27 of 63 (43%) with solid tumors. Individualized actions were taken in 23 of the 91 (25%) based on actionable integrative clinical sequencing findings, including change in treatment for 14 patients (15%) and genetic counseling for future risk for 9 patients (10%). Nine of 91 (10%) of the personalized clinical interventions resulted in ongoing partial clinical remission of 8 to 16 months or helped sustain complete clinical remission of 6 to 21 months. All 9 patients and families with actionable incidental genetic findings agreed to genetic counseling and screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this single-center case series involving young patients with relapsed or refractory cancer, incorporation of integrative clinical sequencing data into clinical management was feasible, revealed potentially actionable findings in 46% of patients, and was associated with change in treatment and family genetic counseling for a small proportion of patients. The lack of a control group limited assessing whether better clinical outcomes resulted from this approach than outcomes that would have occurred with standard care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.