ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Mapping the Conformation Space of Wildtype and Mutant H-Ras with a Memetic, Cellular, and Multiscale Evolutionary Algorithm.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- DyVarMap: Integrating Conformational Dynamics and Interpretable Machine Learning for Cancer-Associated Missense Variant Classification in FGFR2.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structure-based protein and small molecule generation using EGNN and diffusion models: A comprehensive review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: trends from three decades of genetic variant impact predictors.Human genomics · 2024Article
- Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: Trends from 25 years of genetic variant impact predictors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Elucidating the Role of Wildtype and Variant FGFR2 Structural Dynamics in (Dys)Function and Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Molecular docking analysis of KRAS inhibitors for cancer management.Bioinformation · 2023Article
- Conformations and binding pockets of HRas and its guanine nucleotide exchange factors complexes in the guanosine triphosphate exchange process.Journal of computational chemistry · 2022Article
- Intrinsically disordered proteins: Ensembles at the limits of Anfinsen's dogma.Biophysics reviews · 2022Review
- Structural bioinformatics enhances mechanistic interpretation of genomic variation, demonstrated through the analyses of 935 distinct RAS family mutations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Generative Adversarial Learning of Protein Tertiary Structures.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel substituted thiourea derivatives as potential anticancer agents for NSCLC by blocking K-Ras protein-effectors interactions.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2020Article
- Evaluating Autoencoder-Based Featurization and Supervised Learning for Protein Decoy Selection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Attenuating dependence on structural data in computing protein energy landscapes.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Review: Precision medicine and driver mutations: Computational methods, functional assays and conformational principles for interpreting cancer drivers.PLoS computational biology · 2019Review
- From mutations to mechanisms and dysfunction via computation and mining of protein energy landscapes.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Dynamic Network Analysis Reveal the Allosteric Unbinding of Monobody to H-Ras Triggered by R135K Mutation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- Identification of a New Potent Inhibitor Targeting KRAS in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Article
- Intrinsic K-Ras dynamics: A novel molecular dynamics data analysis method shows causality between residue pair motions.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Drugging Ras GTPase: a comprehensive mechanistic and signaling structural view.Chemical Society reviews · 2016Review
- Conformational dynamics of cancer-associated MyD88-TIR domain mutant L252P (L265P) allosterically tilts the landscape toward homo-dimerization.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
An important goal in molecular biology is to understand functional changes upon single-point mutations in proteins. Doing so through a detailed characterization of structure spaces and underlying energy landscapes is desirable but continues to challenge methods based on Molecular Dynamics. In this paper we propose a novel algorithm, SIfTER, which is based instead on stochastic optimization to circumvent the computational challenge of exploring the breadth of a protein's structure space. SIfTER is a data-driven evolutionary algorithm, leveraging experimentally-available structures of wildtype and variant sequences of a protein to define a reduced search space from where to efficiently draw samples corresponding to novel structures not directly observed in the wet laboratory. The main advantage of SIfTER is its ability to rapidly generate conformational ensembles, thus allowing mapping and juxtaposing landscapes of variant sequences and relating observed differences to functional changes. We apply SIfTER to variant sequences of the H-Ras catalytic domain, due to the prominent role of the Ras protein in signaling pathways that control cell proliferation, its well-studied conformational switching, and abundance of documented mutations in several human tumors. Many Ras mutations are oncogenic, but detailed energy landscapes have not been reported until now. Analysis of SIfTER-computed energy landscapes for the wildtype and two oncogenic variants, G12V and Q61L, suggests that these mutations cause constitutive activation through two different mechanisms. G12V directly affects binding specificity while leaving the energy landscape largely unchanged, whereas Q61L has pronounced, starker effects on the landscape. An implementation of SIfTER is made available at http://www.cs.gmu.edu/~ashehu/?q=OurTools. We believe SIfTER is useful to the community to answer the question of how sequence mutations affect the function of a protein, when there is an abundance of experimental structures that can be exploited to reconstruct an energy landscape that would be computationally impractical to do via Molecular Dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.