Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26325287›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Ability to Generate Patient-Derived Breast Cancer Xenografts Is Enhanced in Chemoresistant Disease and Predicts Poor Patient Outcomes.

Priscilla F McAuliffe, Kurt W Evans, Argun Akcakanat, Ken Chen, Xiaofeng Zheng, Hao Zhao, Agda Karina Eterovic, Takafumi Sangai, Ashley M Holder, Chandeshwar Sharma and 13 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  6. Antitumor Activity and Biomarker Analysis for TROP2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate Datopotamab Deruxtecan in Patient-Derived Breast Cancer Xenograft Models.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priscilla F McAuliffeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Kurt W EvansDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Argun AkcakanatDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Ken ChenDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Xiaofeng ZhengDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Hao ZhaoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Agda Karina EterovicDepartment of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Takafumi SangaiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Ashley M HolderDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Chandeshwar SharmaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Huiqin ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Kim-Anh DoDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Emily TarcoDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Mihai GageaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Katherine A NaffDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Aysegul SahinDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Asha S MultaniDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Dalliah M BlackDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Elizabeth A MittendorfDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Isabelle BedrosianDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Gordon B MillsDepartment of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Ana Maria Gonzalez-AnguloDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Funda Meric-BernstamDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
TRAINING OF ACADEMIC SURGICAL ONCOLOGISTST32CA009599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Ashley M Holder, Jennifer A. Wargo · 1988 to 2026
$13.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000371NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer patients who are resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NeoCT) have a poor prognosis. There is a pressing need to develop in vivo models of chemo resistant tumors to test novel therapeutics. We hypothesized that patient-derived breast cancer xenografts (BCXs) from chemo- naïve and chemotherapy-exposed tumors can provide high fidelity in vivo models for chemoresistant breast cancers.

methodsPatient tumors and BCXs were characterized with short tandem repeat DNA fingerprinting, reverse phase protein arrays, molecular inversion probe arrays, and next generation sequencing.

resultsForty-eight breast cancers (24 post-chemotherapy, 24 chemo-naïve) were implanted and 13 BCXs were established (27%). BCX engraftment was higher in TNBC compared to hormone-receptor positive cancer (53.8% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.02), in tumors from patients who received NeoCT (41.7% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.02), and in patients who had progressive disease on NeoCT (85.7% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.02). Twelve patients developed metastases after surgery; in five, BCXs developed before distant relapse. Patients whose tumors developed BCXs had a lower recurrence-free survival (p = 0.015) and overall survival (p<0.001). Genomic losses and gains could be detected in the BCX, and three models demonstrated a transformation to induce mouse tumors. However, overall, somatic mutation profiles including potential drivers were maintained upon implantation and serial passaging. One BCX model was cultured in vitro and re-implanted, maintaining its genomic profile.

conclusionsBCXs can be established from clinically aggressive breast cancers, especially in TNBC patients with poor response to NeoCT. Future studies will determine the potential of in vivo models for identification of genotype-phenotype correlations and individualization of treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHeterograftsHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeMiddle AgedErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID26325287
PMCPMC4556673
OpenAlexW1898809734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.