Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26325069›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Clinical Characteristics Are Similar across Type A and B Influenza Virus Infections.

Anne Mosnier, Saverio Caini, Isabelle Daviaud, Elodie Nauleau, Tan Tai Bui, Emmanuel Debost, Bernard Bedouret, Gérard Agius, Sylvie van der Werf, Bruno Lina and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [Efficacy and safety of pediatric flu vaccination: a systematic review].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Ethanolic Extract fromPreventive nutrition and food science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anne MosnierOpen Rome (Organize and Promote Epidemiological Network), Paris, France.
Saverio CainiOpen Rome (Organize and Promote Epidemiological Network), Paris, France.
Isabelle DaviaudOpen Rome (Organize and Promote Epidemiological Network), Paris, France.
Elodie NauleauOpen Rome (Organize and Promote Epidemiological Network), Paris, France.
Tan Tai BuiOpen Rome (Organize and Promote Epidemiological Network), Paris, France.
Emmanuel DebostGeneral Practitioner or Paediatrician, contributor of the GROG network, Paris, France.
Bernard BedouretGeneral Practitioner or Paediatrician, contributor of the GROG network, Paris, France.
Gérard AgiusLaboratoire de Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Sylvie van der WerfCentre National de Référence des virus influenza, Génétique moléculaire des virus respiratoires, Institut Pasteur, CNRS UMR 3569, Université Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Bruno LinaCentre National de Référence des virus influenza, CBPE, Hospices Civils de Lyon et Virpath, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jean Marie CohenOpen Rome (Organize and Promote Epidemiological Network), Paris, France.
GROG network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies that aimed at comparing the clinical presentation of influenza patients across virus types and subtypes/lineages found divergent results, but this was never investigated using data collected over several years in a countrywide, primary care practitioners-based influenza surveillance system.

methodsThe IBVD (Influenza B in Vircases Database) study collected information on signs and symptoms at disease onset from laboratory-confirmed influenza patients of any age who consulted a sentinel practitioner in France. We compared the clinical presentation of influenza patients across age groups (0-4, 5-14, 15-64 and 65+ years), virus types (A, B) and subtypes/lineages (A(H3N2), pandemic A(H1N1), B Victoria, B Yamagata).

resultsOverall, 14,423 influenza cases (23.9% of which were influenza B) were included between 2003-2004 and 2012-2013. Influenza A and B accounted for over 50% of total influenza cases during eight and two seasons, respectively. There were minor differences in the distribution of signs and symptoms across influenza virus types and subtypes/lineages. Compared to patients aged 0-4 years, those aged 5-14 years were more likely to have been infected with type B viruses (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.87-2.47) while those aged 15-64 years were less likely (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.96). Males and influenza patients diagnosed during the epidemic period were less likely to be infected with type B viruses.

conclusionsDespite differences in age distribution, the clinical illness produced by the different influenza virus types and subtypes is indistinguishable among patients that consult a general practitioner for acute respiratory infections.

Indexed as

Influenza A virusInfluenza B virusAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFranceHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza, Human

Identifiers

PMID26325069
PMCPMC4556513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.