Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26324935›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Insect's intestinal organ for symbiont sorting.

Tsubasa Ohbayashi, Kazutaka Takeshita, Wataru Kitagawa, Naruo Nikoh, Ryuichi Koga, Xian-Ying Meng, Kanako Tago, Tomoyuki Hori, Masahito Hayatsu, Kozo Asano and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. InferiorMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Chemotaxis promotes early colonization and microbiogeography ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. SymbioticmBio · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fidelity in co-diversified symbiosis.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tsubasa OhbayashiGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan;
Kazutaka TakeshitaGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan; Bioproduction Research Institute, Hokkaido Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan;
Wataru KitagawaGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan; Bioproduction Research Institute, Hokkaido Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan;
Naruo NikohDepartment of Liberal Arts, The Open University of Japan, Chiba 261-8586, Japan;
Ryuichi KogaBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8566, Japan;
Xian-Ying MengBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8566, Japan;
Kanako TagoEnvironmental Biofunction Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba 305-8604, Japan;
Tomoyuki HoriEnvironmental Management Research Institute​, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8569, Japan;
Masahito HayatsuEnvironmental Biofunction Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba 305-8604, Japan;
Kozo AsanoGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan;
Yoichi KamagataGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan; Bioproduction Research Institute, Hokkaido Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan;
Bok Luel LeeGlobal Research Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Pusan 609-735, Korea.
Takema FukatsuBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8566, Japan;
Yoshitomo KikuchiGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan; Bioproduction Research Institute, Hokkaido Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan; y-kikuchi@aist.go.jp.
Hokkaido University · JPNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPNational Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences · JPPusan National University · KRThe Open University of Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbiosis has significantly contributed to organismal adaptation and diversification. For establishment and maintenance of such host-symbiont associations, host organisms must have evolved mechanisms for selective incorporation, accommodation, and maintenance of their specific microbial partners. Here we report the discovery of a previously unrecognized type of animal organ for symbiont sorting. In the bean bug Riptortus pedestris, the posterior midgut is morphologically differentiated for harboring specific symbiotic bacteria of a beneficial nature. The sorting organ lies in the middle of the intestine as a constricted region, which partitions the midgut into an anterior nonsymbiotic region and a posterior symbiotic region. Oral administration of GFP-labeled Burkholderia symbionts to nymphal stinkbugs showed that the symbionts pass through the constricted region and colonize the posterior midgut. However, administration of food colorings revealed that food fluid enters neither the constricted region nor the posterior midgut, indicating selective symbiont passage at the constricted region and functional isolation of the posterior midgut for symbiosis. Coadministration of the GFP-labeled symbiont and red fluorescent protein-labeled Escherichia coli unveiled selective passage of the symbiont and blockage of E. coli at the constricted region, demonstrating the organ's ability to discriminate the specific bacterial symbiont from nonsymbiotic bacteria. Transposon mutagenesis and screening revealed that symbiont mutants in flagella-related genes fail to pass through the constricted region, highlighting that both host's control and symbiont's motility are involved in the sorting process. The blocking of food flow at the constricted region is conserved among diverse stinkbug groups, suggesting the evolutionary origin of the intestinal organ in their common ancestor.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsBurkholderiaColoring AgentsDigestive SystemEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularFlagellaGastrointestinal TractGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHeteropteraInsectaIntestinesLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMutagenesisColoring AgentsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsRed Fluorescent ProteinBurkholderiaflagellar motilitygut symbiosispartner choicestinkbug

Identifiers

PMID26324935
PMCPMC4577176
OpenAlexW1900051619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.