Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26324910›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Functional divisions for visual processing in the central brain of flying Drosophila.

Peter T Weir, Michael H Dickinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Neurons sensitive to sky compass signals in the brain of the Madeira cockroach Rhyparobia maderae.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A comprehensive neuroanatomical survey of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. The sky compass network in the brain of the desert locust.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Global inhibition in head-direction neural circuits: a systematic comparison between connectome-based spiking neural circuit models.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter T WeirBiology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Michael H DickinsonBiology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 flyman@caltech.edu.
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Integrative Functional Mapping of Sensory-Motor PathwaysU01NS090514 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DICKINSON, MICHAEL H, HOLMES, PHILIP J · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090514NINDS NIH HHS U01NS090514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although anatomy is often the first step in assigning functions to neural structures, it is not always clear whether architecturally distinct regions of the brain correspond to operational units. Whereas neuroarchitecture remains relatively static, functional connectivity may change almost instantaneously according to behavioral context. We imaged panneuronal responses to visual stimuli in a highly conserved central brain region in the fruit fly, Drosophila, during flight. In one substructure, the fan-shaped body, automated analysis revealed three layers that were unresponsive in quiescent flies but became responsive to visual stimuli when the animal was flying. The responses of these regions to a broad suite of visual stimuli suggest that they are involved in the regulation of flight heading. To identify the cell types that underlie these responses, we imaged activity in sets of genetically defined neurons with arborizations in the targeted layers. The responses of this collection during flight also segregated into three sets, confirming the existence of three layers, and they collectively accounted for the panneuronal activity. Our results provide an atlas of flight-gated visual responses in a central brain circuit.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBrainDrosophila melanogasterFemaleFlight, AnimalGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonNeuronsPhotic StimulationVideotape RecordingVisual PerceptionGreen Fluorescent Proteinscentral complexnavigationsensory-motor transformationstate dependencevision

Identifiers

PMID26324910
PMCPMC4603480
OpenAlexW1826506956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.