ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2015
Patient-reported outcomes in core domain sets for rheumatic diseases.
Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sedentary behaviour interventions in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: a systematic scoping review of intervention content, perceived acceptability and efficacy.BMC rheumatology · 2025Pooled it
- Home-based vs center-based exercise on patient-reported and performance-based outcomes for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of Takayasu arteritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
- Patient-reported outcomes in trials of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a systematic literature review.Rheumatology international · 2016Pooled it
- Using a measurement type-independent metric to compare patterns of determinants between patient-reported versus performance-based physical function in hemodialysis patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Trial
- Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences for 4 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety in Knee Osteoarthritis.The journal of pain · 2017Trial
- Beyond thrombosis: a scoping review of patient-reported outcomes in antiphospholipid syndrome.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Review
- Digital interventions for improving quality of life and physical function in adults aged 50 and over living with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparing Approaches to Link SF-36 PF-10 Scores to PROMIS Physical Function: A Validation Study in Three Clinical Samples.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Patient reported outcomes in the FDA approved drugs for systemic rheumatic diseases (2013-2024).Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Review
- Patient-reported outcome for physical function in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Observational
- Article
- Article
- Factors associated with anxiety and depression in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a cross-sectional study.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2021Article
- PROMIS Global Health: Feasibility in home health.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- The impact of different (rheumatoid) arthritis phenotypes on patients' lives.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Electronic patient-reported outcome measures using mobile health technology in rheumatology: A scoping review.PloS one · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the performance of extreme patient-reported outcomes as surrogate markers for fibromyalgia in axial spondyloarthritis.Rheumatology international · 2019Article
- Unmet Needs in Systemic Sclerosis Understanding and Treatment: the Knowledge Gaps from a Scientist's, Clinician's, and Patient's Perspective.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are abundant in rheumatology and their numbers continue to increase. But which of the available measures are most important? Core outcome sets-including groups of domains and instruments for measuring them-have been defined for many rheumatic diseases, with the aim that all these outcomes should be measured in every clinical trial. The subgroup of PROs included in these core sets is, therefore, undoubtedly important. This Review summarizes the PROs included in core outcome sets developed for use in clinical trials across a wide range of rheumatic diseases. Three PROs are commonly utilized across the majority of rheumatic conditions: pain, physical functioning and the patient global assessment of disease activity. However, additional research is needed to fully understand the role of the patient global assessment of disease activity, to distinguish specific domains within the broad concept of health-related quality of life, and to work towards consensus on the choice between generic and disease-specific instruments in various contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26324860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.