ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2015
Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating methodological quality of prognostic prediction models on patient-reported outcome measurements after total hip and total knee arthroplasty : a systematic review.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical prediction models for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: an external validation based on a systematic review and the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.Acta orthopaedica · 2024Pooled it
- Defining "Paradoxical Instability" and Other Indications for Aseptic Single-Component Polyethylene Revision: A Cohort Study Including Mid-flexion Instability and Limited Arc of Motion.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Prediction of Early Adverse Events After THA: A Comparison of Different Machine-Learning Strategies Based on 262,356 Observations From the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) Dataset.ACR open rheumatology · 2024Article
- The effect of reduced bone mineral density on elective total hip arthroplasty outcomes.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- External Validation of Prediction Models for Surgical Complications in People Considering Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Was Successful for Delirium but Not for Surgical Site Infection, Postoperative Bleeding, and Nerve Damage: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluating methodological quality of prognostic prediction models on patient reported outcome measurements after total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Population-based 10-year cumulative revision risks after hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis to inform patients in clinical practice: a competing risk analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.Acta orthopaedica · 2021Article
- Preoperative vitamin D level does not affect the short-term functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty in elderly women.Knee surgery & related research · 2020Article
- Analysis and Review of Automated Risk Calculators Used to Predict Postoperative Complications After Orthopedic Surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020Review
- Age, gender, functional KSS, reason for revision and type of bone defect predict functional outcome 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty: a multivariable prediction model.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Article
- An international comparison of THA patients, implants, techniques, and survivorship in Sweden, Australia, and the United States.Acta orthopaedica · 2019Article
- Homogeneity in prediction of survival probabilities for subcategories of hipprosthesis data: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association, 2000-2013.Clinical epidemiology · 2019Article
- A risk-stratification algorithm to reduce superficial surgical site complications in primary hip and knee arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2018Article
- CORR Insights®: Statistical Methods Dictate the Estimated Impact of Body Mass Index on Major and Minor Complications After Total Joint Arthroplasty.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Article
- CORR Insights®: American Joint Replacement Registry Risk Calculator Does Not Predict 90-day Mortality in Veterans Undergoing Total Joint Replacement.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Article
- Can patient-reported outcomes predict re-operations after total hip replacement?International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Observational
- CORR InsightsClinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017Article
- Arthroplasty registries around the world: valuable sources of hip implant revision risk data.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConsidering the cost and risk associated with revision Total knee arthroplasty (TKAs) and Total hip arthroplasty (THAs), steps to prevent these operations will help patients and reduce healthcare costs. Revision risk calculators for patients may reduce revision surgery by supporting clinical decision-making at the point of care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to develop a TKA and THA revision risk calculator using data from a large health-maintenance organization's arthroplasty registry and determine the best set of predictors for the revision risk calculator.
methodsRevision risk calculators for THAs and TKAs were developed using a patient cohort from a total joint replacement registry and data from a large US integrated healthcare system. The cohort included all patients who had primary procedures performed in our healthcare system between April 2001 and July 2008 and were followed until January 2014 (TKAs, n = 41,750; THAs, n = 22,721), During the study period, 9% of patients (TKA = 3066/34,686; THA=1898/20,285) were lost to followup and 7% died (TKA= 2350/41,750; THA=1419/20,285). The outcome of interest was revision surgery and was defined as replacement of any component for any reason within 5 years postoperatively. Candidate predictors for the revision risk calculator were limited to preoperative patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedure diagnoses. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and c-statistic were used to choose final models for the revision risk calculator.
resultsThe best predictors for the TKA revision risk calculator were age (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97; p < 0.001), sex (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; p = 0.004), square-root BMI (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.99-1.11; p = 0.140), diabetes (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.17-1.48; p < 0.001), osteoarthritis (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.84-1.62; p = 0.368), posttraumatic arthritis (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.07-2.56; p = 0.022), and osteonecrosis (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.31-4.92; p = 0.006). The best predictors for the THA revision risk calculator were sex (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05-1.46; p = 0.010), age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; p < 0.001), square-root BMI (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00-1.15; p = 0.066), and osteoarthritis (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.09; p = 0.190).
conclusionsStudy model parameters can be used to create web-based calculators. Surgeons can enter personalized patient data in the risk calculators for identification of risk of revision which can be used for clinical decision making at the point of care. Future prospective studies will be needed to validate these calculators and to refine them with time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.