Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26323982›Full record

ArticleOecologia2015

Diving deeper into individual foraging specializations of a large marine predator, the southern sea lion.

A M M Baylis, R A Orben, J P Y Arnould, K Peters, T Knox, D P Costa, I J Staniland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A M M BaylisCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Warrnambool, 3280, Australia. al_baylis@yahoo.com.au.
R A OrbenDepartment of Ocean Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA.
J P Y ArnouldCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Warrnambool, 3280, Australia.
K PetersFalklands Conservation, Ross Road, Stanley, FIQQ1ZZ, Falkland Islands.
T KnoxCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Warrnambool, 3280, Australia.
D P CostaDepartment of Ocean Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA.
I J StanilandBritish Antarctic Survey NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite global declines in the abundance of marine predators, knowledge of foraging ecology, necessary to predict the ecological consequences of large changes in marine predator abundance, remains enigmatic for many species. Given that populations suffering severe declines are of conservation concern, we examined the foraging ecology of southern sea lions (SSL) (Otaria flavescens)-one of the least studied otariids (fur seal and sea lions)-which have declined by over 90% at the Falkland Islands since the 1930s. Using a combination of biologging devices and stable isotope analysis of vibrissae, we redress major gaps in the knowledge of SSL ecology and quantify patterns of individual specialization. Specifically, we revealed two discrete foraging strategies, these being inshore (coastal) and offshore (outer Patagonian Shelf). The majority of adult female SSL (72% or n = 21 of 29 SSL) foraged offshore. Adult female SSL that foraged offshore travelled further (92 ± 20 vs. 10 ± 4 km) and dived deeper (75 ± 23 vs. 21 ± 8 m) when compared to those that foraged inshore. Stable isotope analysis revealed long-term fidelity (years) to these discrete foraging habitats. In addition, we found further specialization within the offshore group, with adult female SSL separated into two clusters on the basis of benthic or mixed (benthic and pelagic) dive behavior (benthic dive proportion was 76 ± 9 vs. 51 ± 8%, respectively). We suggest that foraging specialization in depleted populations such as SSL breeding at the Falkland Islands, are influenced by foraging site fidelity, and could be independent of intraspecific competition. Finally, the behavioral differences we describe are crucial to understanding population-level dynamics, impediments to population recovery, and threats to population persistence.

Indexed as

DivingEcosystemFeeding BehaviorPredatory BehaviorAnimalsEcologyFalkland IslandsFemalePopulation DynamicsSea LionsDietary specializationHabitat selectionHidden Markov modelsSouth American sea lionsState-space models

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.