ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2015
Computational evaluation of phytocompounds for combating drug resistant tuberculosis by multi-targeted therapy.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explicit molecular dynamics simulation studies to discover novel natural compound analogues asHeliyon · 2023Article
- Omics for Bioprospecting and Drug Discovery from Bacteria and Microalgae.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Predictive Binding Affinity of Plant-Derived Natural Products Towards the Protein Kinase G Enzyme ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Investigation of the anti-TB potential of selected propolis constituents using a molecular docking approach.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis interacts with the host counterpart during the pathogenesis of tuberculosis. L-rhamnosyl (L-Rha) residue, a linker connects the arabinogalactan and peptidoglycan moieties in the bacterial cell wall. The biosynthesis of L-rhamnose utilizes four successive enzymes RmlA, RmlB, RmlC and RmlD. Neither rhamnose nor the genes responsible for its synthesis are observed in humans. Thus, drugs inhibiting enzymes of this pathway are unlikely to interfere with metabolic pathways in humans. The adverse drug effects of first and second line drugs along with the development of multi-drug resistance tuberculosis have stimulated the research in search of new therapeutic drugs. Thus, it is attractive to hypothesize that inhibition of the biosynthesis of L-Rha would be lethal to the mycobacteria. Nature provides innumerable secondary metabolites with novel structural architectures with reported activity against M. tuberculosis. Combination of structure based virtual screening with physicochemical and pharmacokinetic studies against rhamnose pathway enzymes identified potential leads. The crucial screening studies recognized four phytocompounds butein, diospyrin, indicanine, and rumexneposide A with good binding affinity towards the rhamnose pathway proteins. Furthermore, the high throughput screening methods recognized butein, a secondary metabolite from Butea monosperma with strong anti-tubercular bioactive spectrum. Butein displayed promising anti-mycobacterial activity which is validated by Microplate alamar blue assay (MABA). The focus on novel agents like these phytocompounds which exhibit preference toward the successive enzymes of a single pathway can prevent the development of bacterial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.