Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26323767›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Horizontal gene flow from Eubacteria to Archaebacteria and what it means for our understanding of eukaryogenesis.

Wasiu A Akanni, Karen Siu-Ting, Christopher J Creevey, James O McInerney, Mark Wilkinson, Peter G Foster, Davide Pisani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Escherichia Coli: What Is and Which Are?Molecular biology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Descent of Bacteria and Eukarya From an Archaeal Root of Life.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Integrative modeling of gene and genome evolution roots the archaeal tree of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. One step beyond a ribosome: The ancient anaerobic core.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2016
    Review
  16. The ring of life hypothesis for eukaryote origins is supported by multiple kinds of data.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  17. Changing ideas about eukaryotic origins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wasiu A AkanniSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TG, UK Department of Biology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland Department of Life Science, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Karen Siu-TingSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TG, UK Department of Biology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland Department of Life Science, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3FG, UK.
Christopher J CreeveyInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3FG, UK.
James O McInerneyDepartment of Biology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Mark WilkinsonDepartment of Life Science, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Peter G FosterDepartment of Life Science, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Davide PisaniSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TG, UK davide.pisani@bristol.ac.uk.
Natural History Museum · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBAberystwyth University · GBNational University of Ireland, Maynooth · IE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G024707/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K007440/
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of the eukaryotic cell is considered one of the major evolutionary transitions in the history of life. Current evidence strongly supports a scenario of eukaryotic origin in which two prokaryotes, an archaebacterial host and an α-proteobacterium (the free-living ancestor of the mitochondrion), entered a stable symbiotic relationship. The establishment of this relationship was associated with a process of chimerization, whereby a large number of genes from the α-proteobacterial symbiont were transferred to the host nucleus. A general framework allowing the conceptualization of eukaryogenesis from a genomic perspective has long been lacking. Recent studies suggest that the origins of several archaebacterial phyla were coincident with massive imports of eubacterial genes. Although this does not indicate that these phyla originated through the same process that led to the origin of Eukaryota, it suggests that Archaebacteria might have had a general propensity to integrate into their genomes large amounts of eubacterial DNA. We suggest that this propensity provides a framework in which eukaryogenesis can be understood and studied in the light of archaebacterial ecology. We applied a recently developed supertree method to a genomic dataset composed of 392 eubacterial and 51 archaebacterial genera to test whether large numbers of genes flowing from Eubacteria are indeed coincident with the origin of major archaebacterial clades. In addition, we identified two potential large-scale transfers of uncertain directionality at the base of the archaebacterial tree. Our results are consistent with previous findings and seem to indicate that eubacterial gene imports (particularly from δ-Proteobacteria, Clostridia and Actinobacteria) were an important factor in archaebacterial history. Archaebacteria seem to have long relied on Eubacteria as a source of genetic diversity, and while the precise mechanism that allowed these imports is unknown, we suggest that our results support the view that processes comparable to those through which eukaryotes emerged might have been common in archaebacterial history.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene FlowBacteriaGenome, BacterialModels, GeneticArchaebacteriaBayesian supertreessymbiosistree of life

Identifiers

PMID26323767
PMCPMC4571575
OpenAlexW1789820056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.