ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015
Horizontal gene flow from Eubacteria to Archaebacteria and what it means for our understanding of eukaryogenesis.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coping with Ineffective Overlap in Multilocus Phylogenetics.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Comparative pan-genomic analysis reveals pathogenic mechanisms and genomic plasticity inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Origin and Early Diversification of the Papain Family of Cysteine Peptidases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Escherichia Coli: What Is and Which Are?Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- The Ancient Origins of Death Domains Support the 'Original Sin' Hypothesis for the Evolution of Programmed Cell Death.Journal of molecular evolution · 2022Article
- Reconciling Asgardarchaeota Phylogenetic Proximity to Eukaryotes and Planctomycetes Cellular Features in the Evolution of Life.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The origin and radiation of the phosphoprotein phosphatase (PPP) enzymes of Eukaryotes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Division of labour in a matrix, rather than phagocytosis or endosymbiosis, as a route for the origin of eukaryotic cells.Biology direct · 2020Article
- Descent of Bacteria and Eukarya From an Archaeal Root of Life.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020Article
- Towards a Dynamic Interaction Network of Life to unify and expand the evolutionary theory.BMC biology · 2018Review
- Biological action in Read-Write genome evolution.Interface focus · 2017Review
- Integrative modeling of gene and genome evolution roots the archaeal tree of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- FastRFS: fast and accurate Robinson-Foulds Supertrees using constrained exact optimization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Membrane Proteins Are Dramatically Less Conserved than Water-Soluble Proteins across the Tree of Life.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- One step beyond a ribosome: The ancient anaerobic core.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2016Review
- The ring of life hypothesis for eukaryote origins is supported by multiple kinds of data.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Review
- Changing ideas about eukaryotic origins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The origin of the eukaryotic cell is considered one of the major evolutionary transitions in the history of life. Current evidence strongly supports a scenario of eukaryotic origin in which two prokaryotes, an archaebacterial host and an α-proteobacterium (the free-living ancestor of the mitochondrion), entered a stable symbiotic relationship. The establishment of this relationship was associated with a process of chimerization, whereby a large number of genes from the α-proteobacterial symbiont were transferred to the host nucleus. A general framework allowing the conceptualization of eukaryogenesis from a genomic perspective has long been lacking. Recent studies suggest that the origins of several archaebacterial phyla were coincident with massive imports of eubacterial genes. Although this does not indicate that these phyla originated through the same process that led to the origin of Eukaryota, it suggests that Archaebacteria might have had a general propensity to integrate into their genomes large amounts of eubacterial DNA. We suggest that this propensity provides a framework in which eukaryogenesis can be understood and studied in the light of archaebacterial ecology. We applied a recently developed supertree method to a genomic dataset composed of 392 eubacterial and 51 archaebacterial genera to test whether large numbers of genes flowing from Eubacteria are indeed coincident with the origin of major archaebacterial clades. In addition, we identified two potential large-scale transfers of uncertain directionality at the base of the archaebacterial tree. Our results are consistent with previous findings and seem to indicate that eubacterial gene imports (particularly from δ-Proteobacteria, Clostridia and Actinobacteria) were an important factor in archaebacterial history. Archaebacteria seem to have long relied on Eubacteria as a source of genetic diversity, and while the precise mechanism that allowed these imports is unknown, we suggest that our results support the view that processes comparable to those through which eukaryotes emerged might have been common in archaebacterial history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.