ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015
The ring of life hypothesis for eukaryote origins is supported by multiple kinds of data.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant pangenomes for crop improvement, biodiversity and evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Recent progress in understanding mitokines as diagnostic and therapeutic targets in hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- The role of mitophagy in innate immune responses triggered by mitochondrial stress.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2020Review
- Division of labour in a matrix, rather than phagocytosis or endosymbiosis, as a route for the origin of eukaryotic cells.Biology direct · 2020Article
- Mitochondrial Contact Sites in Inflammation-Induced Cardiovascular Disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- The last universal common ancestor between ancient Earth chemistry and the onset of genetics.PLoS genetics · 2018Review
- Article
- The role of public goods in planetary evolution.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017Article
- Biological action in Read-Write genome evolution.Interface focus · 2017Review
- Mitochondria are the powerhouses of immunity.Nature immunology · 2017Review
- Microbiology: Mind the gaps in cellular evolution.Nature · 2017Article
- Physiology, phylogeny, and LUCA.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2016Article
- Changing ideas about eukaryotic origins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The literature is replete with manuscripts describing the origin of eukaryotic cells. Most of the models for eukaryogenesis are either autogenous (sometimes called slow-drip), or symbiogenic (sometimes called big-bang). In this article, we use large and diverse suites of 'Omics' and other data to make the inference that autogeneous hypotheses are a very poor fit to the data and the origin of eukaryotic cells occurred in a single symbiosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.