ArticleCancer research and treatment2016
Terminal Versus Advanced Cancer: Do the General Population and Health Care Professionals Share a Common Language?
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preserving the integrity of personhood in people with advanced cancer: An in-depth qualitative study among patients, relatives, and care professionals.Palliative medicine · 2024Article
- Complementary Musical Intervention for Patients in Palliative Care in Spain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A qualitative study on redefining normality in relatives of patients with advanced cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Challenges in self-management of persons living with advanced cancer: An exploratory, in-depth interview study.European journal of cancer care · 2022Article
- Shock Index Is a Validated Prediction Tool for the Short-Term Survival of Advanced Cancer Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Calibrating Natural History of Cancer Models in the Presence of Data Incompatibility: Problems and Solutions.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Article
- Strategies for living well with hormone-responsive advanced prostate cancer-a qualitative exploration.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Shock Index: A Simple and Effective Clinical Adjunct in Predicting 60-Day Mortality in Advanced Cancer Patients at the Emergency Department.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- End-of-life chemotherapy is associated with poor survival and aggressive care in patients with small cell lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018Article
- A research study review of effectiveness of treatments for psychiatric conditions common to end-stage cancer patients: needs assessment for future research and an impassioned plea.BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- Experiences and Opinions Related to End-of-Life Discussion: From Oncologists' and Resident Physicians' Perspectives.Cancer research and treatment · 2018Article
- A qualitative meta-synthesis examining spirituality as experienced by individuals living with terminal cancer.Health psychology openReview
- Article
- Impact of Prognostic Nutritional Index on Terminal Cancer Patients.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byPC-FACS.2016
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMany end-of-life care studies are based on the assumption that there is a shared definition of language concerning the stage of cancer. However, studies suggest that patients and their families often misperceive patients' cancer stages and prognoses. Discrimination between advanced cancer and terminal cancer is important because the treatment goals are different. In this study, we evaluated the understanding of the definition of advanced versus terminal cancer of the general population and determined associated socio-demographic factors. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 2,000 persons from the general population were systematically recruited. We used a clinical vignette of a hypothetical advanced breast cancer patient, but whose cancer was not considered terminal. After presenting the brief history of the case, we asked respondents to choose the correct cancer stage from a choice of early, advanced, terminal stage, and don't know. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to determine sociodemographic factors associated with the correct response, as defined in terms of medical context.
resultsOnly 411 respondents (20.6%) chose "advanced," while most respondents (74.5%) chose "terminal stage" as the stage of the hypothetical patient, and a small proportion of respondents chose "early stage" (0.7%) or "don't know" (4.4%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis found no consistent or strong predictor.
conclusionA large proportion of the general population could not differentiate advanced cancer from terminal cancer. Continuous effort is required in order to establish common and shared definitions of the different cancer stages and to increase understanding of cancer staging for the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.