ReviewILAR journal2015
Manipulating the Gut Microbiota: Methods and Challenges.
Review in ILAR journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Probiotics in the treatment of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaPooled it
- Effects of the antibiotic rifaximin on cortical functional connectivity are mediated through insular cortex.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- The Gut Microbiota-Epilepsy Axis: Bibliometric Trends, Mechanistic Insights, and Microbiota-Targeted Next-Generation Therapeutic Opportunities.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Cytokine Toxicity and Bacterial Dysbiosis in Chemotherapy- and/or Radiotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Interventions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Porphyromonas gingivalis induces intestinal inflammation through gingipain-dependent gut microbiome dysbiosis.Microbiome · 2026Article
- To cohabit or inoculate? Testing the limits of microbiota transplantation in Manila clams.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Role of the gut-brain axis in neurological diseases: Molecular connections and therapeutic implications (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- The endocannabinoidome-gut microbiome-brain axis as a novel therapeutic target for autism spectrum disorder.Journal of biomedical science · 2025Review
- Influence of Water Delivery Method on the Gut Microbiome in Laboratory Mice (Mus musculus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025Article
- Perturbations in the microbiota-gut-brain axis shaped by social status loss.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Differential microbial community assembly following co-housing versus microbiota transplant.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Selection for stress tolerance and longevity in Drosophila melanogaster have strong impacts on microbiome profiles.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Modularized Design and Construction of Tunable Microbial Consortia with Flexible Topologies.ACS synthetic biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Adolescence and the Microbiome: Implications for Healthy Growth and Maturation.The American journal of pathology · 2023Review
- Gut check: Unveiling the influence of acute exercise on the gut microbiota.Experimental physiology · 2023Review
- Bifidobacterium affects antitumor efficacy of oncolytic adenovirus in a mouse model of melanoma.iScience · 2023Article
- A computational method to dissect colonization resistance of the gut microbiota against pathogens.Cell reports methods · 2023Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eukaryotic organisms are colonized by rich and dynamic communities of microbes, both internally (e.g., in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts) and externally (e.g., on skin and external mucosal surfaces). The vast majority of bacterial microbes reside in the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and it is estimated that the gut of a healthy human is home to some 100 trillion bacteria, roughly an order of magnitude greater than the number of host somatic cells. The development of culture-independent methods to characterize the gut microbiota (GM) has spurred a renewed interest in its role in host health and disease. Indeed, associations have been identified between various changes in the composition of the GM and an extensive list of diseases, both enteric and systemic. Animal models provide a means whereby causal relationships between characteristic differences in the GM and diseases or conditions can be formally tested using genetically identical animals in highly controlled environments. Clearly, the GM and its interactions with the host and myriad environmental factors are exceedingly complex, and it is rare that a single microbial taxon associates with, much less causes, a phenotype with perfect sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, while the exact numbers are the subject of debate, it is well recognized that only a minority of gut bacteria can be successfully cultured ex vivo. Thus, to perform studies investigating causal roles of the GM in animal model phenotypes, researchers need clever techniques to experimentally manipulate the GM of animals, and several ingenious methods of doing so have been developed, each providing its own type of information and with its own set of advantages and drawbacks. The current review will focus on the various means of experimentally manipulating the GM of research animals, drawing attention to the factors that would aid a researcher in selecting an experimental approach, and with an emphasis on mice and rats, the primary model species used to evaluate the contribution of the GM to a disease phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.