ArticleNeuro-oncology2016
A prognostic cytogenetic scoring system to guide the adjuvant management of patients with atypical meningioma.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel germline and somatic variants in familial and sporadic meningioma genes.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Malignant Transformation of Meningiomas.Journal of Cancer · 2025Review
- The dural attachment length predict prognosis in patients with recurrent meningiomas.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- The Impact of Molecular and Genetic Analysis on the Treatment of Patients with Atypical Meningiomas.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Evolving Classification of Meningiomas: Integration of Molecular Discoveries to Inform Patient Care.Cancers · 2024Review
- Atypical meningioma: Histopathological, genetic, and epigenetic features to predict recurrence risk.Histology and histopathology · 2024Review
- Atypical meningiomas with an immunohistochemical profile consistent with hypermetabolic or proliferative molecular groups show high mitotic index, chromosomal instability, and higher recurrence risk.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023Article
- Different clinical and cytogenetic features of primary skull base meningiomas and non-skull base meningiomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Surgical strategies for intracranial meningioma in the molecular era.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Review
- Genomic Landscape of Meningiomas.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Molecular classification and grading of meningioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Review
- Dose-response relationship in patients with newly diagnosed atypical meningioma treated with adjuvant radiotherapy.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Meningioma and Other Meningeal Tumors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Brain Invasion and Trends in Molecular Research on Meningioma.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023Review
- Advances in Molecular Biological and Translational Studies in World Health Organization Grades 2 and 3 Meningiomas: A Literature Review.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2022Review
- A molecularly integrated grade for meningioma.Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Potential Molecular Mechanisms of Recurrent and Progressive Meningiomas: A Review of the Latest Literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- The Discrepancy Between Standard Histologic WHO Grading of Meningioma and Molecular Profile: A Single Institution Series.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Discovering the Molecular Landscape of Meningioma: The Struggle to Find New Therapeutic Targets.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Meningioma: not always a benign tumor. A review of advances in the treatment of meningiomas.CNS oncology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe appropriate use of adjuvant therapy in patients with gross totally resected atypical meningioma requires an accurate assessment of recurrence risk. We sought to determine whether cytogenetic/genetic characterization may facilitate better estimation of the probability of recurrence.
methodsWe first analyzed our clinical database, including high-resolution DNA copy number data, to identify 11 common copy number aberrations in a pilot cohort of meningiomas of all grades. We summed these aberrations to devise a cytogenetic abnormality score (CAS) and determined the CAS from archived tissue of a separate cohort of 32 patients with gross totally resected atypical meningioma managed with surgery alone. Propensity score adjusted Cox regression was used to determine whether the CAS was predictive of recurrence.
resultsAn association between higher CAS and higher grade was noted in our pilot cohort with heterogeneity among atypical tumors. Among the 32 patients who underwent gross total resection of an atypical meningioma, the CAS was not significantly associated with age, gender, performance status, or tumor size/location but was associated with the risk of recurrence on univariable analysis (hazard ratio per aberration = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.08-2.14; P = .02). After adjustment, the impact of the dichotomized number of copy aberrations remained significantly associated with recurrence risk (hazard ratio = 4.47; 95% CI = 1.01-19.87; P = .05).
conclusionsThe number of copy number aberrations is strongly associated with recurrence risk in patients with atypical meningioma following gross total resection and may inform the appropriate use of adjuvant radiation therapy in these patients or be useful for stratification in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.