Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26323508›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2015

Exploring the context in which different close-to-community sexual and reproductive health service providers operate in Bangladesh: a qualitative study.

Ilias Mahmud, Sadia Chowdhury, Bulbul Ashraf Siddiqi, Sally Theobald, Hermen Ormel, Salauddin Biswas, Yamin Tauseef Jahangir, Malabika Sarker, Sabina Faiz Rashid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ilias MahmudJames P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ilias@bracu.ac.bd.
Sadia ChowdhuryJames P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. sadia.chowdhury@bracu.ac.bd.
Bulbul Ashraf SiddiqiJames P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. bulbul_ashraf@yahoo.com.
Sally TheobaldDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. sally.theobald@lstmed.ac.uk.
Hermen OrmelRoyal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.ormel@kit.nl.
Salauddin BiswasJames P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. s.biswas@bracu.ac.bd.
Yamin Tauseef JahangirJames P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. yamin@bracu.ac.bd.
Malabika SarkerJames P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. malabika@bracu.ac.bd.
Sabina Faiz RashidJames P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. sabina@bracu.ac.bd.
BRAC University · BDLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBRoyal Tropical Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA range of formal and informal close-to-community (CTC) health service providers operate in an increasingly urbanized Bangladesh. Informal CTC health service providers play a key role in Bangladesh's pluralistic health system, yet the reasons for their popularity and their interactions with formal providers and the community are poorly understood. This paper aims to understand the factors shaping poor urban and rural women's choice of service provider for their sexual and reproductive health (SRH)-related problems and the interrelationships between these providers and communities. Building this evidence base is important, as the number and range of CTC providers continue to expand in both urban slums and rural communities in Bangladesh. This has implications for policy and future programme interventions addressing the poor women's SRH needs.

methodsData was generated through 24 in-depth interviews with menstrual regulation clients, 12 focus group discussions with married men and women in communities and 24 semi-structured interviews with formal and informal CTC SRH service providers. Data was collected between July and September 2013 from three urban slums and one rural site in Dhaka and Sylhet, Bangladesh. Atlas.ti software was used to manage data analysis and coding, and a thematic analysis was undertaken.

resultsPoor women living in urban slums and rural areas visit a diverse range of CTC providers for SRH-related problems. Key factors influencing their choice of provider include the following: availability, accessibility, expenses and perceived quality of care, the latter being shaped by notions of trust, respect and familiarity. Informal providers are usually the first point of contact even for those clients who subsequently access SRH services from formal providers. Despite existing informal interactions between both types of providers and a shared understanding that this can be beneficial for clients, there is no effective link or partnership between these providers for referral, coordination and communication regarding SRH services.

conclusionTraining informal CTC providers and developing strategies to enable better links and coordination between this community-embedded cadre and the formal health sector has the potential to reduce service cost and improve availability of quality SRH (and other) care at the community level.

Indexed as

Patient PreferencePoverty AreasAdolescentAdultBangladeshCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchReproductive Health ServicesRural PopulationTrust

Identifiers

PMID26323508
PMCPMC4556024
OpenAlexW2146622432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.