Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26323490›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2015

Darunavir: A Review in Pediatric HIV-1 Infection.

Gillian M Keating

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. COVID-19 therapy: What weapons do we bring into battle?Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gillian M KeatingSpringer, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay 0754, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@springer.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Darunavir (Prezista®), administered in combination with ritonavir and background antiretroviral therapy, is approved in the USA and the EU for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in pediatric patients aged ≥3 years. Ritonavir-boosted darunavir provided effective virologic suppression in treatment-naïve adolescents with HIV-1 infection, according to the results of the noncomparative, phase II DIONE trial. Ritonavir-boosted darunavir also had sustained efficacy in treatment-experienced children and/or adolescents with HIV-1 infection, according to the results of the noncomparative, phase II DELPHI and ARIEL trials. Ritonavir-boosted darunavir was generally well tolerated in pediatric patients with HIV-1 infection. Although more data are needed in pediatric populations (particularly data comparing darunavir with other antiretroviral agents), ritonavir-boosted darunavir is an important option for the treatment of pediatric patients with HIV-1 infection.

Indexed as

Anti-Retroviral AgentsChildDarunavirHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansAnti-Retroviral AgentsDarunavirHIV Protease Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.