Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26323480›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2016

Heterogeneity of the gut microbiome in mice: guidelines for optimizing experimental design.

Debby Laukens, Brigitta M Brinkman, Jeroen Raes, Martine De Vos, Peter Vandenabeele

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 241 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
241citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

241 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 369 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A host of issues: pseudoreplication in host-microbiota studies.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. The OMMGut microbes · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

181 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Debby LaukensDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Brigitta M BrinkmanInflammation Research Center, VIB, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Jeroen RaesCenter for the Biology of Disease, VIB, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium Department Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Martine De VosDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Peter VandenabeeleInflammation Research Center, VIB, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium Methusalem Program, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium Peter.Vandenabeele@irc.vib-ugent.be.
Ghent University · BEKU Leuven · BEVIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted manipulation of the gut flora is increasingly being recognized as a means to improve human health. Yet, the temporal dynamics and intra- and interindividual heterogeneity of the microbiome represent experimental limitations, especially in human cross-sectional studies. Therefore, rodent models represent an invaluable tool to study the host-microbiota interface. Progress in technical and computational tools to investigate the composition and function of the microbiome has opened a new era of research and we gradually begin to understand the parameters that influence variation of host-associated microbial communities. To isolate true effects from confounding factors, it is essential to include such parameters in model intervention studies. Also, explicit journal instructions to include essential information on animal experiments are mandatory. The purpose of this review is to summarize the factors that influence microbiota composition in mice and to provide guidelines to improve the reproducibility of animal experiments.

Indexed as

AnimalsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansModels, AnimalResearch Designanimal facilityanimal modelsconfounding factorsmicrobiomemicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID26323480
PMCPMC4703068
OpenAlexW1716352502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.