Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26323382›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2016

HPV-FASTER: broadening the scope for prevention of HPV-related cancer.

F Xavier Bosch, Claudia Robles, Mireia Díaz, Marc Arbyn, Iacopo Baussano, Christine Clavel, Guglielmo Ronco, Joakim Dillner, Matti Lehtinen, Karl-Ulrich Petry and 9 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Clearance with aDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 15 institutions in 13 countries.

F Xavier BoschUnit of Infections and Cancer (UNIC), Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Catala d' Oncologia-Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Avenida Gran Via 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Claudia RoblesUnit of Infections and Cancer (UNIC), Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Catala d' Oncologia-Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Avenida Gran Via 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia DíazUnit of Infections and Cancer (UNIC), Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Catala d' Oncologia-Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Avenida Gran Via 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Marc ArbynUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.
Iacopo BaussanoInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Christine ClavelCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Reims, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UMR-S 903, Reims, France.
Guglielmo RoncoUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Centre for Cancer Prevention (CPO), Torino, Italy.
Joakim DillnerDepartments of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Matti LehtinenUniversity of Tampere, School of Health Sciences, Tampere, Finland.
Karl-Ulrich PetryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Mario PoljakInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Susanne K KjaerVirus, Lifestyle &Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Centre; and Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Chris J L M MeijerDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre (VUmc), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Suzanne M GarlandDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jorge SalmerónUnidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Xavier CastellsaguéUnit of Infections and Cancer (UNIC), Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Catala d' Oncologia-Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Avenida Gran Via 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Laia BruniUnit of Infections and Cancer (UNIC), Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Catala d' Oncologia-Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Avenida Gran Via 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia de SanjoséUnit of Infections and Cancer (UNIC), Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Catala d' Oncologia-Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Avenida Gran Via 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Jack CuzickCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Institut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESFraunhofer Project Centre Wolfsburg · DEInserm · FRInstitut Scientifique de Santé Publique · BEKarolinska Institutet · SEMexican Social Security Institute · MXQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal Women's Hospital · AUTampere University · FIUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16891Cancer Research UK C569/A16891World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related screening technologies and HPV vaccination offer enormous potential for cancer prevention, notably prevention of cervical cancer. The effectiveness of these approaches is, however, suboptimal owing to limited implementation of screening programmes and restricted indications for HPV vaccination. Trials of HPV vaccination in women aged up to 55 years have shown almost 90% protection from cervical precancer caused by HPV16/18 among HPV16/18-DNA-negative women. We propose extending routine vaccination programmes to women of up to 30 years of age (and to the 45-50-year age groups in some settings), paired with at least one HPV-screening test at age 30 years or older. Expanding the indications for HPV vaccination and much greater use of HPV testing in screening programmes has the potential to accelerate the decline in cervical cancer incidence. Such a combined protocol would represent an attractive approach for many health-care systems, in particular, countries in Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America, Asia, and some more-developed parts of Africa. The role of vaccination in women aged >30 years and the optimal number of HPV-screening tests required in vaccinated women remain important research issues. Cost-effectiveness models will help determine the optimal combination of HPV vaccination and screening in public health programmes, and to estimate the effects of such approaches in different populations.

Indexed as

AdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesSensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26323382
OpenAlexW1275532855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.