Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26323050›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing care quality

Nurses' Numeracy and Graphical Literacy: Informing Studies of Clinical Decision Support Interfaces.

Karen Dunn Lopez, Diana J Wilkie, Yingwei Yao, Vanessa Sousa, Alessandro Febretti, Janet Stifter, Andrew Johnson, Gail M Keenan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing care quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Inpatient nurses' preferences and decisions with risk information visualization.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Using Feedback Intervention Theory to Guide Clinical Dashboard Design.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen Dunn LopezDepartment of Health Systems Science, College of Nursing (Drs Lopez, Sousa and Stifter), Department of Biobehavioral Health Science (Dr Wilkie), and Electronic Visualization Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering (Mr Febretti and Dr Johnson), University of Illinois at Chicago; and Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing (Drs Wilkie and Yao), and Department of Family, Community and Health Systems Science (Dr Keenan), University of Florida, Gainesville.
Diana J Wilkie
Yingwei Yao
Vanessa Sousa
Alessandro Febretti
Janet Stifter
Andrew Johnson
Gail M Keenan

Funding

Describing, Contrasting, and Visualizing End-of-Life Care in the 21st CenturyR01NR012949 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ANSARI, RASHID, KEENAN, GAIL M · 2011 to 2014
$2.0M
NINR NIH HHS 1R01 NR012949NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present findings of a comparative study of numeracy and graph literacy in a representative group of 60 practicing nurses. This article focuses on a fundamental concern related to the effectiveness of numeric information displayed in various features in the electronic health record during clinical workflow. Our findings suggest the need to consider numeracy and graph literacy when presenting numerical information as well as the potential for tailoring numeric display types to an individual's cognitive strengths.

Indexed as

ComprehensionComputer LiteracyDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHealth LiteracyMathematicsAdultAgedDecision MakingElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursesProblem Solving

Identifiers

PMID26323050
PMCPMC4764393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.