Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26322998›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

CTDB: An Integrated Chickpea Transcriptome Database for Functional and Applied Genomics.

Mohit Verma, Vinay Kumar, Ravi K Patel, Rohini Garg, Mukesh Jain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Comprehensive Review on Chickpea (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohit VermaFunctional and Applied Genomics Laboratory, National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), New Delhi, India.
Vinay KumarFunctional and Applied Genomics Laboratory, National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), New Delhi, India.
Ravi K PatelFunctional and Applied Genomics Laboratory, National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), New Delhi, India.
Rohini GargFunctional and Applied Genomics Laboratory, National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), New Delhi, India.
Mukesh JainFunctional and Applied Genomics Laboratory, National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), New Delhi, India.
National Institute of Plant Genome Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chickpea is an important grain legume used as a rich source of protein in human diet. The narrow genetic diversity and limited availability of genomic resources are the major constraints in implementing breeding strategies and biotechnological interventions for genetic enhancement of chickpea. We developed an integrated Chickpea Transcriptome Database (CTDB), which provides the comprehensive web interface for visualization and easy retrieval of transcriptome data in chickpea. The database features many tools for similarity search, functional annotation (putative function, PFAM domain and gene ontology) search and comparative gene expression analysis. The current release of CTDB (v2.0) hosts transcriptome datasets with high quality functional annotation from cultivated (desi and kabuli types) and wild chickpea. A catalog of transcription factor families and their expression profiles in chickpea are available in the database. The gene expression data have been integrated to study the expression profiles of chickpea transcripts in major tissues/organs and various stages of flower development. The utilities, such as similarity search, ortholog identification and comparative gene expression have also been implemented in the database to facilitate comparative genomic studies among different legumes and Arabidopsis. Furthermore, the CTDB represents a resource for the discovery of functional molecular markers (microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms) between different chickpea types. We anticipate that integrated information content of this database will accelerate the functional and applied genomic research for improvement of chickpea. The CTDB web service is freely available at http://nipgr.res.in/ctdb.html.

Indexed as

CicerDatabases, GeneticFabaceaeGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNATranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID26322998
PMCPMC4556341
OpenAlexW1245369934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.