Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26322781›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Performance Comparison of Three Rapid Tests for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Antonino Catanzaro, Timothy C Rodwell, Donald G Catanzaro, Richard S Garfein, Roberta L Jackson, Marva Seifert, Sophia B Georghiou, Andre Trollip, Erik Groessl, Naomi Hillery and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-commercial phenotypic assays for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance: a systematic review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.Chonnam medical journal · 2018
    Review
  9. Impact of Fluoroquinolone Use on Mortality Among a Cohort of Patients With Suspected Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Mobility patterns of persons at risk for drug-resistant tuberculosis in Mumbai, India.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2016
    Observational
  15. GenoTypeThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A performance evaluation of MTBDRplus version 2 for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Antonino CatanzaroUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Timothy C RodwellUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Donald G CatanzaroUniversity of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Richard S GarfeinUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Roberta L JacksonUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Marva SeifertUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Sophia B GeorghiouUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Andre TrollipStellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Erik GroesslUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Naomi HilleryUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Valeriu CruduInstitute of Phthisiopneumology, Chisinau, Moldova.
Thomas C VictorStellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Camilla RodriguesPD Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Grace Shou-Yean LinMicrobial Diseases Laboratory, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States of America.
Faramarz ValafarSan Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Edward DesmondMicrobial Diseases Laboratory, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States of America.
Kathleen EisenachUniversity of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America.
University of California, San Diego · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USStellenbosch University · ZAP. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre · INPhthisiopneumology Institute "Chiril Draganiuc" · MDSan Diego State University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Arkansas at Little Rock · US

Funding

Rapid Tests for Drug Resistance to Detect Extensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisU01AI082229 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CATANZARO, ANTONINO · 2009 to 2013
$10.9M
Evolutionary and Functional Significance of Novel Mutations in MDR-XDR TBR01AI105185 · NIAID · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VALAFAR, FARAMARZ · 2013 to 2021
$5.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI105185NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI082229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the performance of several recently developed assays for the detection of multi- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) in a large, multinational field trial.

methodsSamples from 1,128 M/XDR-TB suspects were examined by Line Probe Assay (LPA), Pyrosequencing (PSQ), and Microscopic Observation of Drug Susceptibility (MODS) and compared to the BACTEC MGIT960 reference standard to detect M/XDR-TB directly from patient sputum samples collected at TB clinics in India, Moldova, and South Africa.

resultsSpecificity for all three assays was excellent: 97-100% for isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), moxifloxacin (MOX) and ofloxacin (OFX) and 99-100% for amikacin (AMK), capreomycin (CAP) and kanamycin (KAN) resistance. Sensitivities were lower, but still very good: 94-100% for INH, RIF, MOX and OFX, and 84-90% for AMK and CAP, but only 48-62% for KAN. In terms of agreement, statistically significant differences were only found for detection of RIF (MODS outperformed PSQ) and KAN (MODS outperformed LPA and PSQ) resistance. Mean time-to-result was 1.1 days for LPA and PSQ, 14.3 days for MODS, and 24.7 days for MGIT.

conclusionsAll three rapid assays evaluated provide clinicians with timely detection of resistance to the drugs tested; with molecular results available one day following laboratory receipt of samples. In particular, the very high specificity seen for detection of drug resistance means that clinicians can use the results of these rapid tests to avoid the use of toxic drugs to which the infecting organism is resistant and develop treatment regiments that have a higher likelihood of yielding a successful outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntitubercular AgentsChildDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialExtensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMoldovaMycobacterium tuberculosisProspective StudiesAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID26322781
PMCPMC4556461
OpenAlexW1727928392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.