ArticleFrontiers in oncology2015
A Simpler Energy Transfer Efficiency Model to Predict Relative Biological Effect for Protons and Heavier Ions.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- A neural network embedding the linear-quadratic model for improved prediction of cellular response to ion beam exposure.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of eye-preserving treatment with particle beam radiotherapy for orbital malignancies.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes after particle radiation therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- RadPhysBio: A Radiobiological Database for the Prediction of Cell Survival upon Exposure to Ionizing Radiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Influence of beam pruning techniques on LET and RBE in proton arc therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Intensity-modulated particle beam radiation therapy in the management of olfactory neuroblastoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Investigating the impact of alpha/beta and LETMedical physics · 2020Article
- Impact of Hypoxia on Carbon Ion Therapy in Glioblastoma Cells: Modulation by LET and Hypoxia-Dependent Genes.Cancers · 2020Article
- Clinical Radiobiology of Fast Neutron Therapy: What Was Learnt?Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Volumetric parameters derived from FLT-PET performed at completion of treatment predict efficacy of Carbon-ion Radiotherapy in patients with locally recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Outcomes of orbital malignancies treated with eye-sparing surgery and adjuvant particle radiotherapy: a retrospective study.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Salvage Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy For Locoregionally Recurrent Head and Neck Malignancies.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The radiobiological effects of He, C and Ne ions as a function of LET on various glioblastoma cell lines.Journal of radiation research · 2019Article
- A step towards international prospective trials in carbon ion radiotherapy: investigation of factors influencing dose distribution in the facilities in operation based on a case of skull base chordoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2019Article
- Article
- Why RBE must be a variable and not a constant in proton therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2016Article
- Corrigendum: A Simpler Energy Transfer Efficiency Model to Predict Relative Biological Effect for Protons and Heavier Ions.Frontiers in oncology · 2016Article
- The Organ Sparing Potential of Different Biological Optimization Strategies in Proton Therapy.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this work is to predict relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for protons and clinically relevant heavier ions, by using a simplified semi-empirical process based on rational expectations and published experimental results using different ion species. The model input parameters are: Z (effective nuclear charge) and radiosensitivity parameters αL and βL of the control low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. Sequential saturation processes are assumed for: (a) the position of the turnover point (LETU) for the LET-RBE relationship with Z, and (b) the ultimate value of α at this point (αU) being non-linearly related to αL. Using the same procedure for β, on the logical assumption that the changes in β with LET, although smaller than α, are symmetrical with those of α, since there is symmetry of the fall off of LET-RBE curves with increasing dose, which suggests that LETU must be identical for α and β. Then, using iso-effective linear quadratic model equations, the estimated RBE is scaled between αU and αL and between βU and βL from for any input value of Z, αL, βL, and dose. The model described is fitted to the data of Barendsen (alpha particles), Weyrather et al. (carbon ions), and Todd for nine different ions (deuterons to Argon), which include variations in cell surviving fraction and dose. In principle, this new system can be used to complement the more complex methods to predict RBE with LET such as the local effect and MKM models which already have been incorporated into treatment planning systems in various countries. It would be useful to have a secondary check to such systems, especially to alert clinicians of potential risks by relatively easy estimation of relevant RBEs. In clinical practice, LET values smaller than LETU are mostly encountered, but the model extends to higher values beyond LETU for other purposes such as radiation, protection, and astrobiology. Considerable further research is required, perhaps in a dedicated international laboratory, using a basket of different models to determine what the best system or combination of systems will be to make proton and ion beam radiotherapy as safe as possible and to produce the best possible clinical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.