ArticleSpringerPlus2015
Microbial community profiles of the colon from steers differing in feed efficiency.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Composite Antimicrobial Peptides on Colonic Microbiota and Barrier Integrity in Holstein Steers.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Integrative Multi-Omics Analysis of the Rumen inMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of ruminal and fecal microbiomes in Holstein, Jersey, and Jeju Black cattle using multiple taxonomic classifiers.Animal biotechnology · 2025Article
- Microbial Biomarkers Differ for Various Feed Efficiency Metrics in Beef Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Effects of Mongolian Bergenia crassifolia L. (root) extract on rumen methane emission and microbial community.Animal bioscience · 2025Article
- Microbiota diversity and association with performance phenotypes in beef bulls.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Multi-omics insights into key microorganisms and metabolites in Tibetan sheep's high-altitude adaptation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Temporal establishment of the colon microbiota in Angus calves from birth to post-weaning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Duodenum and Caecum Microbial Shift Modulates Immune and Antioxidant Response Through Energy Homeostasis inAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Alterations in the Microbiomes and Metabolic Profiles of the Ileal Between the Hu Sheep and East Friesian Sheep.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Microbiological Characteristics of the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Jersey and Holstein Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The microbiota: a key regulator of health, productivity, and reproductive success in mammals.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Fermented total mixed ration enhances nutrient digestibility and modulates the milk components and fecal microbial community in lactating Holstein dairy cows.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Ruminal and feces metabolites associated with feed efficiency, water intake and methane emission in Nelore bulls.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Integrating Omics Technologies for a Comprehensive Understanding of the Microbiome and Its Impact on Cattle Production.Biology · 2023Review
- Bacterial community structure in the rumen and hindgut is associated with nitrogen efficiency in Holstein cows.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- - Invited Review - Assessment of the gastrointestinal microbiota using 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing in ruminant nutrition.Animal bioscience · 2023Article
- Cecal microbiota of feedlot cattle fed a four-species Bacillus supplement.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comparative untargeted metabolome analysis of ruminal fluid and feces of Nelore steers (Bos indicus).Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ruminal microbial fermentation plays an essential role in host nutrition, and as a result, the rumen microbiota have been a major focus of research examining bovine feed efficiency. Microbial communities within other sections of the gastrointestinal tract may also be important with regard to feed efficiency, since it is critical to the health and nutrition of the host. The objective of this study was to characterize the microbial communities of the colon among steers differing in feed efficiency. Individual feed intake (FI) and body weight (BW) gain were determined from animals fed the same ration, within two contemporary groups of steers. Four steers from each contemporary group within each Cartesian quadrant were sampled (n = 16/group) from the bivariate distribution of average daily BW gain and average daily FI. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicons were sequenced from the colon content using next-generation sequencing technology. Within the colon content, UniFrac principal coordinate analyses did not detect any separation of microbial communities, and bacterial diversity or richness did not differ between efficiency groups. Relative abundances of microbial populations and operational taxonomic units did reveal significant differences between efficiency groups. The phylum Firmicutes accounted for up to 70% of the populations within all samples, and families Ruminococcaceae and Clostridiaceae were highly abundant. Significant population shifts in taxa were detected, including the families Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Sphingomonadaceae, and the genera Butyrivibrio, Pseudobutyrivibrio, Prevotella, Faecalibacterium and Oscillospira. This study suggests the association of the colon microbial communities as a factor influencing feed efficiency at the 16S level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.