Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26322225›Full record

ArticleCell & bioscience2015

Characterization of novel carcinoma cell lines for the analysis of therapeutical strategies fighting pancreatic cancer.

Dietmar Zechner, Florian Bürtin, Jonas Amme, Tobias Lindner, Tobias Radecke, Stefan Hadlich, Jens-Peter Kühn, Brigitte Vollmar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell & bioscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dietmar ZechnerInstitute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Schillingallee 69a, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2075-7540
Florian BürtinInstitute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Schillingallee 69a, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Jonas AmmeInstitute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Schillingallee 69a, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Tobias LindnerCore Facility Small Animal Imaging, Rostock University Medical Center, Schillingallee 69a, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Tobias RadeckeInstitute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Schillingallee 69a, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Stefan HadlichDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Sauerbruchstr. 1, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Jens-Peter KühnDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Sauerbruchstr. 1, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Brigitte VollmarInstitute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Schillingallee 69a, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
University of Rostock · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical evaluations of chemotherapies depend on clinically relevant animal models for pancreatic cancer. The injection of syngeneic murine adenocarcinoma cells is one efficient option to generate carcinomas in mice with an intact immune system. However, this option is constrained by the paucity of appropriate cell lines.

resultsThe murine pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines 6606PDA and 7265PDA were compared to the 6606l cell line isolated from a liver metastasis from mice suffering from pancreatic cancer. In tissue culture 6606PDA and 6606l proliferated faster than 7265PDA. 7265PDA cells were, however, significantly more sensitive to gemcitabine as assessed by BrdU-incorporation and trypan blue exclusion assays in vitro. Within 1 week after injection of either one of these three cell lines into the pancreas of C57BL/6J mice, carcinomas were observed by T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Three weeks after injecting 6606PDA or 6606l cells large carcinomas could be characterized, which were surrounded by extensive desmoplastic reaction. After injection of 7265PDA cells, however, remission of cancer was observed between the first and the third week. Compared to 6606PDA cell derived carcinomas a higher apparent diffusion coefficient was quantified by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in these tumors. This correlated with reduced cancer cell density observed on histological sections.

conclusionAll three cell lines can be used in vitro for testing combinatorial therapies with gemcitabine. The 6606PDA and 6606l cell lines but not the 7265PDA cell line can be used for evaluating distinct therapies in a syngeneic carcinoma model using C57BL/6J mice. Diffusion-weighted MRI proved to be an appropriate method to predict tumor remission.

Indexed as

Cancer immunologyCancer remissionCombinatorial therapyDesmoplasiaNoninvasive imagingPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaSyngeneic cancer model

Identifiers

PMID26322225
PMCPMC4551666
OpenAlexW1821430226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.