Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26322212›Full record

ArticleAddiction & health

Post-operative Analgesia in Opioid Dependent Patients: Comparison of Intravenous Morphine and Sublingual Buprenorphine.

Shaabanali Alizadeh, Ghafar Ali Mahmoudi, Hassan Solhi, Bahman Sadeghi-Sedeh, Reza Behzadi, Amir Mohammad Kazemifar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shaabanali AlizadehAssistant Professor, General Surgeon, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Ghafar Ali MahmoudiAssistant Professor, Legal Medicine and Clinical Toxicologist, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Hassan SolhiAssociate Professor, Clinical Toxicologist, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Bahman Sadeghi-SedehAssistant Professor, Epidemiologist, Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Reza BehzadiResearcher, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Amir Mohammad KazemifarAssociate Professor, Clinical Toxicologist, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute and chronic pain is prevalent in patients with opioid dependence. Lack of knowledge concerning the complex relationship between pain, opioid use, and withdrawal syndrome can account for the barriers encountered for pain management. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of sublingual (SL) buprenorphine for post-operative analgesia, compared with intravenous (IV) morphine.

methodsA total of 68 patients, aged 20-60 years were randomly selected from whom had been underwent laparotomy due to acute abdomen in a University Teaching Hospital in Arak, Iran, and were also opioid (opium or heroin) abuser according to their history. After end of the surgery and patients' arousal, the patients were evaluated for abdominal pain and withdrawal syndrome by visual analog scale (VAS) and clinical opioid withdrawal score (COWS), respectively 1, 6, and 24 h after the surgery. They received either morphine 5 mg IV or buprenorphine 2 mg SL, 1 h after end of the surgery, and then every 6 h for 24 h.

findingsVAS was 4.47 ± 0.73 and 2.67 ± 0.53 at h 6 and 24 in buprenorphine group, respectively. The corresponding score was 5.88 ± 0.69 and 4.59 ± 0.74 in morphine group. At the same time, patients in buprenorphine experienced less severe withdrawal syndrome.

conclusionThe present study confirmed the efficacy of SL buprenorphine as a non-invasive, but effective method for management of post-operative pain in opioid dependent patients. Result of this study showed that physicians can rely on SL buprenorphine for post-operative analgesia.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineMorphineOpioid dependencePost-operative painWithdrawal syndrome

Identifiers

PMID26322212
PMCPMC4530195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.