Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26322153›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2015

Endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures.

Kavel H Visrodia, James H Tabibian, Todd H Baron

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Endoscopic management of benign and malignant hilar stricture.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: A review and update.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2017
    Article
  11. The freedom of choice.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kavel H VisrodiaKavel H Visrodia, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
James H TabibianKavel H Visrodia, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Todd H BaronKavel H Visrodia, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Creative Research Enterprises (United States) · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic management of biliary obstruction has evolved tremendously since the introduction of flexible fiberoptic endoscopes over 50 years ago. For the last several decades, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become established as the mainstay for definitively diagnosing and relieving biliary obstruction. In addition, and more recently, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has gained increasing favor as an auxiliary diagnostic and therapeutic modality in facilitating decompression of the biliary tree. Here, we provide a review of the current and continually evolving role of gastrointestinal endoscopy, including both ERCP and EUS, in the management of biliary obstruction with a focus on benign biliary strictures.

Indexed as

Bile ductsBiliary tractEndoscopic cholangiopancreatographyGastrointestinal endoscopyStentsStricture

Identifiers

PMID26322153
PMCPMC4549657
OpenAlexW2345185788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.