Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26322134›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2015

MINEs: open access databases of computationally predicted enzyme promiscuity products for untargeted metabolomics.

James G Jeffryes, Ricardo L Colastani, Mona Elbadawi-Sidhu, Tobias Kind, Thomas D Niehaus, Linda J Broadbelt, Andrew D Hanson, Oliver Fiehn, Keith E J Tyo, Christopher S Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SelenzymeRF: updated enzyme suggestion software for unbalanced biochemical reactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James G JeffryesDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL USA ; Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL USA.
Ricardo L ColastaniMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL USA.
Mona Elbadawi-SidhuWest Coast Metabolomics Center, University of California, Davis, CA USA.
Tobias KindWest Coast Metabolomics Center, University of California, Davis, CA USA.
Thomas D NiehausHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
Linda J BroadbeltDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL USA.
Andrew D HansonHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
Oliver FiehnWest Coast Metabolomics Center, University of California, Davis, CA USA ; Biochemistry Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Keith E J TyoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL USA.
Christopher S HenryMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL USA.

Funding

West Coast Central Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource Core (WC3MRC)U24DK097154 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FIEHN, OLIVER · 2012 to 2017
$9.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spite of its great promise, metabolomics has proven difficult to execute in an untargeted and generalizable manner. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has made it possible to gather data on thousands of cellular metabolites. However, matching metabolites to their spectral features continues to be a bottleneck, meaning that much of the collected information remains uninterpreted and that new metabolites are seldom discovered in untargeted studies. These challenges require new approaches that consider compounds beyond those available in curated biochemistry databases. DESCRIPTION: Here we present Metabolic In silico Network Expansions (MINEs), an extension of known metabolite databases to include molecules that have not been observed, but are likely to occur based on known metabolites and common biochemical reactions. We utilize an algorithm called the Biochemical Network Integrated Computational Explorer (BNICE) and expert-curated reaction rules based on the Enzyme Commission classification system to propose the novel chemical structures and reactions that comprise MINE databases. Starting from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) COMPOUND database, the MINE contains over 571,000 compounds, of which 93% are not present in the PubChem database. However, these MINE compounds have on average higher structural similarity to natural products than compounds from KEGG or PubChem. MINE databases were able to propose annotations for 98.6% of a set of 667 MassBank spectra, 14% more than KEGG alone and equivalent to PubChem while returning far fewer candidates per spectra than PubChem (46 vs. 1715 median candidates). Application of MINEs to LC-MS accurate mass data enabled the identity of an unknown peak to be confidently predicted.

conclusionsMINE databases are freely accessible for non-commercial use via user-friendly web-tools at http://minedatabase.mcs.anl.gov and developer-friendly APIs. MINEs improve metabolomics peak identification as compared to general chemical databases whose results include irrelevant synthetic compounds. Furthermore, MINEs complement and expand on previous in silico generated compound databases that focus on human metabolism. We are actively developing the database; future versions of this resource will incorporate transformation rules for spontaneous chemical reactions and more advanced filtering and prioritization of candidate structures. Graphical abstractMINE database construction and access methods. The process of constructing a MINE database from the curated source databases is depicted on the left. The methods for accessing the database are shown on the right.

Indexed as

Enzyme promiscuityLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometryMetabolite identificationUntargeted metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID26322134
PMCPMC4550642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.